- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating the platform.
- All revenue is consulting revenue at 100%, indicating a fully advisory-oriented revenue mix with no disclosed dependence on other service lines.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, supporting a substantial recurring workload base for valuation analysis.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates a high operating margin before owner compensation and is favorable from a buyer’s cash flow perspective.
- There are 4 partners and 20 staff, and the derived revenue per partner is $2.0 million, showing a concentrated partner group supporting the current revenue base.
- At 50% EBOC, the firm’s earnings conversion is modest relative to revenue, which can cap valuation on a buyer’s cash-flow multiple.
- The practice is 100% consulting revenue, creating a single-service-line concentration that increases valuation sensitivity to any weakness in consulting demand.
- With only 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm is relatively small in scale, which can limit operational leverage and make it harder to absorb overhead or diversify risk.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million suggests the business is highly partner-driven, which can raise execution and continuity risk in a transaction if any partner departs.
- Maintain and expand the firm’s high-margin profile, as EBOC is 50% on $8.0M of gross revenue, supporting valuation quality if sustained.
- Increase revenue per partner, which is already $2.0M, by improving partner leverage and delegating more billable work to the 20-person staff base.
- Scale the existing consulting-only revenue mix, since consulting revenue is 100% of total revenue and the firm has a focused service model that can be expanded without changing the practice mix.
- Improve capacity utilization and throughput from the current 30,000 billable hours by converting more hours into revenue through pricing discipline and workload management.
- Preserve and deepen the firm’s current partner bench, as 4 partners with a relatively young stated age profile of 32 suggests room to build continuity and scale over time.
- At $8.0M gross revenue with only 4 partners, the firm is highly partner-dependent, which can create key-person and succession risk if one or more partners reduce involvement or exit.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, implying a relatively lean staffing base that may limit capacity to absorb growth, turnover, or utilization volatility without service strain.
- Revenue is reported as 100% consulting, so the business lacks service-line diversification and is exposed to concentration in a single offering mix.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is strong, but it also indicates that valuation is heavily tied to sustaining partner productivity rather than a broader institutional platform.
- The partner age field shows 32, which suggests a younger ownership group and may imply a longer runway, but it also means the firm’s current economics are still closely tied to the existing partner group rather than a mature succession structure.