- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing a meaningful revenue base for valuation analysis.
- With 30,000 billable hours, the practice shows substantial operating volume and utilization capacity.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and other below-the-line items.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, which supports a scalable operating structure relative to its revenue base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, reflecting a high level of revenue concentration per equity owner.
- EBOC is only 50%, which indicates a relatively thin earnings base and limits valuation support versus higher-margin firms.
- With 30,000 total billable hours on $8,000,000 of revenue, the firm generates about $267 of revenue per billable hour, which may constrain pricing power and scalability.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 across only 4 partners suggests earnings and client relationships are concentrated at a small leadership group, increasing key-person risk.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 4 partners, which is a modest operating scale and may limit depth and succession flexibility for a buyer.
- With $8.0M of gross revenue and only 4 partners, there is clear opportunity to increase partner leverage by expanding staff-supported delivery and reducing reliance on partner time.
- At 50% EBOC, the firm has room to improve operating margin through tighter expense management and better utilization of the existing 20-person staff base.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M suggests meaningful upside from scaling the platform by adding capacity and/or increasing throughput without a proportional increase in partner count.
- Billable hours of 30,000 indicate an opportunity to raise realized output by improving utilization and converting more available capacity into revenue.
- The relatively young partner group (age 32) supports a longer runway to build value through sustained growth and gradual expansion of the firm’s operating scale.
- With only 4 partners and 20 staff supporting $8.0M of gross revenue, the firm appears relatively partner-dependent, which can create key-person and succession risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is high relative to the small partner group, suggesting earnings may be sensitive to partner capacity and retention rather than broadly distributed across the team.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours against $8.0M of revenue, implying a meaningful reliance on sustained utilization and pricing discipline to maintain current performance.
- Although EBOC is a strong 50%, the absence of practice-level detail or other operating metrics in the data limits visibility into the durability and mix of that margin.
- The partner age field is recorded as 32, which provides limited evidence of near-term succession pressure, but it also leaves buyer diligence to confirm the stability and tenure of the partner group.