Anjo
Strategic Advisory Excellence Since 1984
Executive Dashboard
Strategic Outlook 2026–2028
$8,000,000
Annual Gross Revenue
37.50%
EBITDA Margin
$21M - $30M
Valuation Range
75%
Economic Profit%
4
No. of Equity Partners
$267/hr
Avg Client Rate ($/hr)
20
Total Employees
50%
Overhead as % of Revenue
Valuation-Based Strategic Position
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Strengths
  • The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale from a valuation perspective.
  • Revenue per partner of $2.0 million indicates productive partner leverage relative to the four-partner structure.
  • A 50% consulting revenue mix gives the firm significant non-compliance service diversification, which can support higher-quality earnings.
  • An EBOC margin of 50% suggests solid profitability at the enterprise level.
  • The firm has 30,000 total billable hours supported by 20 staff, indicating a material operating base for current revenue production.
Weaknesses
  • The firm's revenue is heavily concentrated in consulting at 50%, which may create service-line dependence and reduce earnings visibility if that work slows.
  • Audit and tax together represent only 20% of revenue, indicating limited recurring compliance revenue that can support valuation stability.
  • With four partners and one partner aged 65, the firm may face near-term succession and retention risk if ownership transition is not well managed.
  • Revenue per partner of $2.0 million suggests meaningful partner dependence, which can increase key-person risk and make earnings more sensitive to partner departures.
Opportunities
  • Increase higher-margin recurring services by leveraging the firm’s 50% consulting mix, which already represents the largest revenue stream.
  • Expand the audit and tax practices from their current 10% revenue share each to improve service line balance and reduce reliance on consulting concentration.
  • Improve operational leverage and valuation by increasing revenue per partner beyond the current $2.0 million through better delegation and utilization of the 20-person staff.
  • Address succession and continuity risk given the partner age profile, particularly the 65-year-old partner, to support a smoother transition and stronger buyer confidence.
Threats
  • The firm appears to have a meaningful succession risk because one partner is 65 while the remaining partners are materially younger, which may create transition and retention uncertainty.
  • Revenue is heavily concentrated in consulting at 50%, which may expose the firm to higher client demand volatility and less recurring revenue stability than a more diversified mix.
  • The firm’s service mix is only 20% audit and tax combined, which may limit revenue diversification and increase dependence on consulting market conditions.
  • With four partners generating $8,000,000 of revenue, the business may face key-person concentration risk if any partner reduces involvement or departs.
Enhance Profitability

May drive premium valuation, strong cash flow, and high investor demand while supporting scalable growth and resilience.

37.50% EBITDA margin
Operational Efficiency

You are doing a great job on leverage, continue to look for opportunities to push work down to the appropriate levels, and remember that leverage is your biggest pathway to high levels of profitability

Leverage ratio 5:1
Revenue Acceleration

Without a defined growth rate, growth may be accelerated by adding advisory services, pursuing tuck-in mergers, or onboarding a lateral partner with an existing book of business.

+15–25% revenue growth
Risk Mitigation

May enhance operational capacity, diversify expertise, and strengthen continuity, but can introduce complexity in decision-making and profit sharing.
May support continuity, smoother succession planning, stronger long-term client retention, and greater capacity to adapt to growth and innovation initiatives.

[0, 0]

This preliminary valuation range is for discussion purposes only, based on unverified information, and is highly sensitive to assumptions. It does not constitute a formal valuation or transaction guidance and should not be relied upon by any party for decision-making purposes.