- Tax services dominate the revenue mix at 75%, providing a clear core practice that drives the majority of firm revenue.
- The firm generates $25.0 million of gross revenue across 140,000 billable hours, indicating a meaningful operating scale for a three-partner practice.
- Revenue per partner is approximately $8.3 million, which is a material productivity metric from a buyer’s valuation perspective.
- The practice includes defined specialty areas in real estate, high-net-worth, trusts and estates, and nonprofit work, showing multiple stated niche service lines.
- The firm also has audit and consulting components, contributing 15% and 10% of revenue respectively and adding some diversification beyond tax.
- EBOC at 20% indicates a relatively thin earnings margin, limiting valuation support versus higher-margin firms.
- Revenue is concentrated in tax at 75%, with audit at 15% and consulting at 10%, creating service-line mix concentration risk for a buyer.
- The firm has only 3 partners supporting $25,000,000 of revenue, which creates meaningful key-person and succession risk around a very small ownership base.
- Revenue per partner of $8,333,333 is high relative to the small partner group, suggesting the platform is heavily dependent on a few individuals.
- Audit represents only 15% of revenue, which limits recurring attest diversification and may reduce cross-sell and balance across service lines.
- Increase non-tax service lines, since tax represents 75% of revenue while audit and consulting together account for only 25%, creating room to diversify the mix and reduce concentration risk.
- Expand higher-value advisory work within the existing niche base of real estate, high-net-worth, trust and estate, and nonprofit clients, as the firm already has specialized niches that can support cross-sell and deeper wallet share.
- Improve partner leverage and succession readiness, as three partners support 95 staff and the partner group is relatively concentrated, which can enhance scalability and reduce key-person risk over time.
- Build on the firm’s $25 million revenue base and $8.3 million revenue per partner to strengthen operating scale and valuation through continued growth without proportionate partner expansion.
- Increase audit and consulting penetration where appropriate, since both are materially smaller than tax and could provide a more balanced revenue mix if the firm can convert existing client relationships into additional services.
- Tax work represents 75% of gross revenue, so the firm appears heavily dependent on one service line and may face earnings pressure if that demand softens.
- The practice mix is concentrated in a few specialized niches, including real estate, high-net-worth, trust and estate, and not-for-profit, which can make future growth more dependent on those segments than on a broad client base.
- With only 3 partners supporting 95 staff, the firm may face key-person and management continuity risk if partner capacity becomes stretched or one partner departs.
- Partner age is listed as 49, which suggests the current ownership group may have a limited runway before succession planning becomes a valuation issue.
- Audit and consulting together account for only 25% of revenue, limiting diversification and leaving the firm more exposed to changes in tax-related demand.