- Tax services dominate the revenue mix at 75% of gross revenue, providing a clear core earnings base.
- The firm generates $25.0 million of gross revenue, which is material in size for valuation analysis.
- With only 3 partners, revenue per partner is approximately $8.3 million, indicating high partner-level productivity.
- The practice has defined specialty areas in real estate, high-net-worth, trusts and estates, and nonprofit work, which supports service-line concentration.
- The firm reports 140,000 billable hours, showing a substantial volume of fee-earning work underpinning operations.
- EBITDA of 20% on $25.0 million of revenue may limit upside versus higher-margin peer firms and can constrain valuation multiples.
- Revenue is 75% tax and only 15% audit, creating a heavy dependence on one service line that increases earnings concentration risk.
- With only 3 partners generating $8.33 million of revenue per partner, the firm appears highly partner-dependent, which can elevate succession and key-person risk.
- The firm has 95 staff supporting 140,000 billable hours, which suggests limited scale relative to headcount and may leave less room for operational leverage.
- Consulting contributes only 10% of revenue, indicating a relatively narrow service mix that may cap cross-sell and diversification benefits.
- Deepen the higher-value tax-led mix, as tax work already represents 75% of gross revenue and can support stronger pricing and client stickiness relative to lower-share service lines.
- Expand consulting from its current 10% of revenue to improve service mix and capture more advisory work from the existing client base, which could enhance margins and valuation.
- Leverage the firm’s specialized niches in real estate, HNW, T&E, and NFP to reinforce differentiation and support premium positioning in targeted client segments.
- Increase partner leverage and succession depth, since the firm has 3 partners, 95 staff, and partner ages centered around 49, which suggests room to build a broader leadership bench and reduce key-person concentration.
- Improve operating efficiency and scale around the current 20% EBITDA margin and 140,000 billable hours to convert the firm’s size into stronger profitability and earnings quality.
- Revenue is heavily weighted to tax work at 75% of gross revenue, which can limit diversification and make the earnings base more dependent on one service line.
- The firm’s EBITDA margin is 20%, which leaves only moderate operating cushion if compensation, staffing, or other overhead costs rise.
- With 95 staff supporting 3 partners, the practice may require substantial partner oversight and delegation, creating execution risk if leadership capacity is stretched.
- The partner group is relatively small at 3 partners, so the business may face key-person dependency and succession risk if one partner becomes unavailable or exits.
- The firm’s revenue per partner of about 8.3 million is high, which can indicate strong productivity but also suggests meaningful reliance on a limited number of rainmakers to sustain current performance.