- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which indicates a meaningful operating scale for a regional accounting practice.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across four partners, suggesting solid partner productivity relative to the firm's size.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, supporting a substantial level of service delivery capacity.
- The revenue mix includes significant audit, tax, and consulting contributions at 70% each, indicating diversified service lines within the practice.
- Partner succession risk is elevated because one partner is age 70 while the remaining partners are much younger, creating a potential transition and continuity gap.
- The firm appears highly concentrated in its core service lines, with audit, tax, and consulting each representing 70% of revenue, suggesting limited diversification as presented in the data.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 may indicate meaningful dependence on a small partner group, which can increase key-person risk in a transaction.
- The firm has only 20 staff supporting 4 partners, which may constrain scalability and increase operational reliance on partner involvement.
- The firm’s very high revenue concentration in audit, tax, and consulting indicates an opportunity to diversify and broaden its service mix to reduce reliance on any single line of business.
- With 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff, there may be room to improve capacity utilization and leverage the existing team to support revenue growth without immediate proportional headcount increases.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 suggests strong partner productivity, and the firm may be able to scale further by formalizing delegation and reducing dependence on partner-level delivery.
- The partner age profile shows one significantly older partner alongside three much younger partners, creating an opportunity to strengthen succession planning and support an orderly ownership transition.
- An EBOC of 50% suggests meaningful profitability, leaving room to improve valuation through margin enhancement and tighter operational efficiency.
- Partner age distribution indicates a succession and continuity risk, with one partner aged 70 and limited evidence of near-term leadership transition.
- The firm appears heavily dependent on a small partner group, which can create key-person risk and reduce operational resilience if one or more partners depart.
- Revenue concentration across audit, tax, and consulting at the same reported 70% level suggests the service mix may be limited or data quality may be inconsistent, which increases uncertainty in assessing earnings stability.
- The staff base of 20 employees against 30,000 billable hours may indicate operational leverage pressure and potential capacity constraints if demand increases or turnover occurs.