fsegae
Strategic Advisory Excellence Since 1984
Executive Dashboard
Strategic Outlook 2026–2028
$8,000,000
Annual Gross Revenue
37.50%
EBITDA Margin
$21M - $30M
Valuation Range
75%
Economic Profit%
4
No. of Equity Partners
$267/hr
Avg Client Rate ($/hr)
20
Total Employees
50%
Overhead as % of Revenue
Valuation-Based Strategic Position
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Strengths
  • The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is the most material top-line strength in the data set.
  • With 30,000 billable hours, the firm shows meaningful operating scale that can support a buyer’s integration and transition planning.
  • The firm reports an EBOC margin of 50%, indicating a substantial level of earnings conversion relative to revenue.
  • Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across 4 partners, which is a strong productivity metric for valuation analysis.
  • The ownership group is evenly sized at 4 partners, and the partner ages are all listed as 20, suggesting a uniform partner profile in the provided data.
Weaknesses
  • EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate earnings quality and leaves limited cushion for a buyer seeking premium cash flow conversion.
  • Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 is concentrated across just 4 partners, which increases key-person dependency and succession risk for the transaction.
  • The firm has only 20 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, which suggests limited scale and may constrain operating leverage or post-close absorption of integration work.
  • With 30,000 total billable hours on $8,000,000 of revenue, the firm generates about $267 per billable hour, a level that can indicate pricing or mix limitations relative to a buyer’s growth expectations.
Opportunities
  • Improve partner leverage by expanding staff-supported delivery, as the firm has 4 partners, 20 staff, and $2.0 million of revenue per partner, indicating room to scale partner capacity.
  • Increase billable hours from the current 30,000 level to better absorb fixed partner capacity and support revenue growth without adding proportional partner count.
  • Preserve and potentially enhance the 50% EBOC margin through tighter utilization and delivery discipline, which would directly support valuation quality.
  • Use the relatively young partner group (all partners age 20) to build a longer operating runway and support continuity-driven growth over time.
Threats
  • The firm’s $8.0M of gross revenue is supported by only 4 partners, creating key-person dependency and transition risk if any partner reduces involvement or exits.
  • Partner ages are all listed as 20, which suggests an unusually young ownership group and may indicate limited succession depth or experience concentration risk.
  • With 20 staff against 4 partners and 30,000 billable hours, the practice may be operationally dependent on a relatively small leadership base to absorb workload and manage delivery quality.
  • Revenue per partner of $2.0M is high relative to the small partner count, which can pressure partner capacity and make earnings more sensitive to partner productivity changes.
Enhance Profitability

May drive premium valuation, strong cash flow, and high investor demand while supporting scalable growth and resilience.

37.50% EBITDA margin
Operational Efficiency

You are doing a great job on leverage, continue to look for opportunities to push work down to the appropriate levels, and remember that leverage is your biggest pathway to high levels of profitability

Leverage ratio 5:1
Revenue Acceleration

Without a defined growth rate, growth may be accelerated by adding advisory services, pursuing tuck-in mergers, or onboarding a lateral partner with an existing book of business.

+15–25% revenue growth
Risk Mitigation

May enhance operational capacity, diversify expertise, and strengthen continuity, but can introduce complexity in decision-making and profit sharing.
May support continuity, smoother succession planning, stronger long-term client retention, and greater capacity to adapt to growth and innovation initiatives.

[0, 0]

This preliminary valuation range is for discussion purposes only, based on unverified information, and is highly sensitive to assumptions. It does not constitute a formal valuation or transaction guidance and should not be relied upon by any party for decision-making purposes.