- Gross revenue of $8.0 million provides meaningful scale for a four-partner firm.
- Revenue is diversified across audit (33%), tax (32%), and consulting (3%), reducing reliance on a single service line.
- EBOC of 50% indicates that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses, supporting earnings quality.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million suggests strong productivity at the partner level.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, indicating substantial annual production capacity.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate operating margin, which can limit valuation upside versus higher-margin firms.
- With 30,000 total billable hours on $8,000,000 of revenue, revenue per billable hour is about $267, which may signal pricing or realization pressure relative to the firm’s revenue base.
- The firm’s service mix is concentrated in audit (33%) and tax (32%), leaving 65% of revenue tied to two core compliance lines and only 3% from consulting, which limits diversification and cross-sell leverage.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 across only 4 partners suggests the business is highly dependent on a small partner group, increasing transition and retention risk if any partner departs.
- Partner ages are clustered at 34, 34, 45, and 53, which creates a limited succession runway and potential key-person dependence on the older partner group.
- Increase the audit and tax mix, which together represent 65% of revenue, to support a more stable and scalable core service base.
- Expand consulting from its current 3% of revenue to improve service diversification and lift overall margin potential.
- Leverage the firm’s 50% EBOC margin by adding higher-value work or improving pricing and realization on existing engagements.
- Use the 20-person staff base and 30,000 billable hours to increase leverage and absorb more work without a proportional increase in partner count.
- Build on the $2.0 million revenue per partner to improve partner productivity through stronger delegation and broader client coverage.
- Revenue is concentrated in audit and tax work, with audit at 33% and tax at 32% of gross revenue, which can limit diversification and increase sensitivity to changes in those core service lines.
- The firm’s staffing base is relatively lean at 20 staff against 4 partners and 30,000 billable hours, which may create execution and capacity risk if workload increases or key personnel are unavailable.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million is high relative to the firm’s size, suggesting partner dependence and potential key-person risk if one or more partners reduce involvement or exit.
- Consulting contributes only 3% of revenue, indicating limited cross-sell diversification and a narrower service mix than a more balanced practice.
- Partner ages are mixed but include two partners at 34 and one at 53, which may create succession and continuity risk if ownership transition planning is not well developed.