- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating acquisition size.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating that half of gross revenue remains after expenses and providing a clear profitability metric for valuation analysis.
- The practice produces 30,000 billable hours, showing substantial operating volume that supports the revenue base.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that can be assessed for transition and continuity.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a useful productivity indicator from a buyer’s perspective.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates only half of revenue is available before partner compensation and may pressure valuation on a normalized earnings basis.
- The firm has only 4 partners supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, creating key-person and transition risk if buyer continuity depends on a small leadership group.
- All four partners are age 20, which provides no visible succession risk from age, but the lack of age dispersion suggests the data set does not support any retirement-based de-risking for a buyer.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000, which is high relative to the firm’s size and suggests meaningful reliance on a limited partner group rather than a broad ownership base.
- Increase revenue per partner, as the firm currently generates $2.0M per partner on $8.0M of gross revenue with 4 partners, indicating room to scale partner-led production or leverage.
- Improve operating leverage and profitability by building on the 50% EBOC margin, which suggests meaningful upside if overhead is controlled while revenue grows.
- Expand billable capacity through the 20-person staff base relative to 30,000 billable hours, creating an opportunity to increase throughput without adding partners.
- Plan for succession and continuity given all four partners are listed at age 20, which supports a long runway for retention and orderly growth if the data reflects current ownership structure.
- The firm’s revenue is concentrated at the partner level, with 4 partners and only $2.0M of revenue per partner, which can create key-person dependency and transition risk in a transaction.
- Partner ages are all listed as 20, which provides no evidence of near-term succession pressure but does indicate a very young ownership profile that may limit demonstrated leadership depth and continuity history.
- With 20 staff supporting $8.0M of revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the operating model may be relatively lean, increasing execution risk if workload grows or if even a small amount of capacity is lost.
- An EBOC margin of 50% is solid, but it still leaves meaningful exposure to earnings volatility if billable hours or staffing efficiency soften.
- The absence of any practice-level detail in the data limits visibility into service-line mix and operating concentration, which can make valuation diligence more conservative.