- The firm generated gross revenue of 1.85 million with 13,000 billable hours, indicating a meaningful operating scale for a single-partner practice.
- Revenue is evenly split between tax and consulting at 50 percent each, which shows a balanced service mix rather than reliance on one line of work.
- Consulting contributes 50 percent of revenue, supporting a substantial advisory component in the overall business mix.
- The practice has defined niche focus areas in restaurants, high-net-worth clients, and owner-managed businesses, which can support targeted service delivery.
- The firm produced an EBOC margin of 42 percent, providing a clear profitability metric for valuation analysis.
- EBITDA-like profitability is only 42% of revenue, which limits earnings quality relative to the firm’s $1.85 million top line.
- The firm has one partner versus six staff, creating key-person and succession risk around the 53-year-old owner that can affect valuation and transition planning.
- Revenue is evenly split between tax and consulting at 50% each, so the business lacks clear service-line diversification beyond this two-way concentration.
- At $1.85 million of revenue with only 13,000 billable hours, the practice remains relatively small in scale, which can constrain buyer comfort and integration leverage.
- Increase consulting revenue mix above the current 50% to improve growth and valuation leverage, since the firm already has a balanced tax and consulting split and strong EBOC margins of 42%.
- Expand billable capacity and delegation through the six-person staff base to reduce reliance on the single partner and support higher revenue per partner than the current 1.85 million level.
- Deepen the firm’s restaurant, high-net-worth, and owner-managed business niches to reinforce specialization and potentially support premium pricing and stronger client retention.
- Preserve and scale the firm’s high-margin operating profile, as the 42% EBOC margin suggests room to convert existing revenue into additional earnings through disciplined growth.
- Build succession depth around the 53-year-old sole partner to reduce key-person concentration and improve continuity, which is important given the firm’s one-partner structure.
- Revenue is highly concentrated in a single-partner structure, with one partner supporting 1.85 million of gross revenue, which creates key-person and succession risk for a buyer.
- The firm has only six staff against 13,000 billable hours, suggesting a lean operating model that may be difficult to scale without adding capacity or increasing workload pressure.
- At 42 percent, EBOC is solid but not exceptional for a professional services firm, leaving limited room to absorb margin pressure if staffing costs or utilization weaken.
- Half of revenue comes from consulting and half from tax, so the business lacks diversification across service lines and may be more exposed to swings in either core workstream.
- The partner age of 53 indicates succession planning will matter in the medium term, particularly given the single-partner ownership structure.