- Tax services are the largest revenue stream at 48% of gross revenue, giving the firm a clear core practice concentration.
- The firm generated $8.4 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale metric for valuation analysis.
- With 6 partners and 34 staff, the firm has a multi-partner operating structure supported by a substantial employee base.
- Revenue per partner is $1.4 million, indicating a relatively productive partner economics profile.
- Audit contributes 32% of revenue and consulting contributes 20%, showing diversified non-tax service lines alongside the core tax practice.
- EBOC of 31% suggests a modest earnings base relative to revenue, which can limit valuation on a seller’s discretionary earnings multiple.
- Revenue is concentrated in tax at 48%, creating service-line dependence that can increase valuation risk if that workload changes.
- With 6 partners and $8.4 million of revenue, revenue per partner is $1.4 million, indicating a relatively small platform that may constrain scale premiums in a buyer’s model.
- Increase the tax-heavy revenue mix, since tax work represents 48% of gross revenue and can provide a more recurring, sticky base that supports valuation stability.
- Expand consulting services, as consulting is only 20% of revenue and there is room to grow higher-value advisory work relative to the current mix.
- Improve operating leverage and scalability, given 35,500 billable hours across 34 staff and 6 partners, which suggests opportunity to better deploy capacity and support margin expansion.
- Strengthen partner succession and continuity planning, as the partner group is relatively concentrated with an average age of 51 and only 6 partners, which can reduce key-person risk and support transferability.
- Build on the firm’s solid earnings profile, with EBOC at 31% of revenue, by maintaining or improving profitability through mix and utilization discipline.
- Tax work represents 48% of gross revenue, so the firm is materially dependent on one service line and may face earnings volatility if that demand softens.
- The firm has 6 partners and 34 staff, which indicates a relatively partner-heavy structure that can constrain scalability and increase key-person dependence.
- Revenue per partner is about 1.4 million, which suggests each partner carries a large share of the economic burden and could create execution risk if partner productivity slips.
- Audit revenue is 32% and consulting revenue is 20%, leaving a concentrated mix across a few service lines rather than a broadly diversified revenue base.
- The partner age shown as 51 implies succession planning will matter over the medium term, as the current ownership group is not especially young.