- The firm generates $1,035,887 of gross revenue with only one partner, resulting in $1,035,887 of revenue per partner.
- Consulting accounts for 52% of revenue, indicating a majority consulting mix within the current revenue base.
- Tax work remains a meaningful part of the business at 48% of revenue, providing a balanced service mix alongside consulting.
- The firm produced 4,269 billable hours, showing a measurable level of productive capacity in the year.
- EBOC is 50%, which provides a clear profitability metric for valuation analysis.
- With only $1,035,887 of gross revenue and one partner, the firm has limited scale and a single-key-person structure that can constrain valuation and transitionability.
- The practice is only 48% tax revenue and 52% consulting revenue, so its service mix is not anchored by a clear core line and may be viewed as less predictable than a more specialized platform.
- Gross revenue of $1,035,887 spread across 4,269 billable hours implies an average billing yield of about $243 per billable hour, which may limit pricing leverage in a buyer’s underwriting.
- The firm has just 3 staff supporting 1 partner, indicating a very small operating base that can limit capacity and increase buyer dependency on the existing team.
- EBOC of 50% suggests only moderate earnings conversion, which may cap valuation if a buyer is underwriting sustainable owner-level profitability.
- Increase scale by adding partners or senior staff, as the firm currently has 1 partner and 3 staff supporting $1.04M of gross revenue, which suggests meaningful key-person concentration and limited capacity for growth.
- Expand the consulting mix, as consulting represents 52% of revenue versus 48% tax revenue, allowing the firm to lean further into higher-value advisory work if it can sustain margins.
- Protect and potentially improve profitability, since EBOC is already 50% and any operational leverage from added capacity or better workflow could translate directly into higher enterprise value.
- Build a more balanced service mix by growing beyond the near-even tax/consulting split, which may reduce dependence on a single revenue stream and support more stable growth.
- Increase revenue per partner through additional production capacity, as current revenue of $1,035,887 is concentrated with only one partner, indicating room to scale output without changing the core model.
- With only one partner (age 44) and three staff, the firm is highly dependent on a very small leadership base, creating key-person and continuity risk if the partner is unavailable or reduces involvement.
- The staffing base of three employees against $1.0 million of gross revenue and 4,269 billable hours suggests a lean operating model that may be difficult to scale without adding capacity or increasing workload concentration.
- Consulting represents 52% of revenue versus 48% tax revenue, so earnings are tied to a relatively balanced but still limited two-service mix, which can constrain diversification and make performance more sensitive to shifts in either line.
- Billable hours of 4,269 across a small team indicate meaningful utilization pressure, which can limit flexibility for business development, quality control, and succession planning.
- EBOC of 50% is solid, but on a single-partner platform the reported profitability may be vulnerable to changes in partner productivity or overhead absorption if the current operating structure changes.