- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale point for a buyer evaluating transaction size.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating high partner-level productivity based on the provided derived metric.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, showing a substantial volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- EBOC is 50%, which provides a clear profitability indicator for valuation analysis.
- The partner group is relatively young at age 32, which may support continuity in leadership based on the explicit partner age data.
- EBOC is 50%, which suggests only half of gross revenue is converting to owner cash flow and can cap valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- The firm generates $8,000,000 of revenue with only 4 partners and 4 staff, indicating a very lean operating base that may constrain capacity and scalability.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 across just 4 partners, creating meaningful partner reliance and concentration of production at the equity level.
- Partner ages are 32, so the ownership group appears early in career and the buyer may face limited immediate succession or monetization leverage from retirements.
- Increase leverage by expanding staff capacity relative to 4 partners and 4 staff, which could support higher billable-hour throughput and improve scalability.
- Raise revenue per partner from the current $2.0 million by adding capacity and/or improving partner productivity, creating more value per equity holder.
- Build on the 50% EBOC margin by maintaining discipline on costs while growing billable hours, preserving strong profitability as revenue scales.
- The firm’s revenue base is modest at $8.0M with only 4 partners, creating meaningful key-person dependency and limiting diversification of earnings power.
- Staffing appears thin relative to scale, with just 4 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, which may constrain capacity, execution consistency, and near-term growth.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is high relative to the small team size, suggesting partner-heavy delivery and potential succession or retention risk if partner availability changes.
- EBOC margin of 50% is solid, but it may be difficult to sustain if the firm must add personnel or infrastructure to support the current billable-hour volume.
- The firm’s partner age is listed as 32, which may indicate a younger ownership group and therefore less immediate succession pressure, but it also implies limited historical depth in the ownership base.