- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating the platform.
- All revenue is consulting revenue at 100%, indicating a fully service-based revenue mix with no dependence on other lines of business.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, which supports a substantial recurring workload base.
- EBOC is 50%, showing that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and other items.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that can support current production levels.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating a high level of revenue concentration per equity partner.
- EBITDA/EBOC is only 50% of gross revenue, which limits earnings conversion and can weigh on valuation.
- All $8,000,000 of revenue comes from consulting, creating full service-line concentration and less diversified earnings quality.
- The firm has only 4 partners and 20 staff, a small operating scale that can limit buyer confidence in depth and transferability of the practice.
- Increase revenue per partner, as the firm already generates $2.0M per partner and has room to scale partner-led production more efficiently.
- Improve operating leverage and margin expansion, since EBOC is already 50% and the 4-partner/20-staff structure suggests potential to convert scale into higher profitability.
- Expand billable capacity and utilization, because 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff indicates a meaningful base from which to add revenue without changing the consulting-only mix.
- Preserve and deepen the 100% consulting revenue mix by building on the current service concentration, which supports a focused positioning and valuation story.
- Develop succession depth early given the relatively young partner group at age 32, which can support continuity and reduce key-person risk over time.
- Revenue is entirely consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), leaving the firm without any demonstrated diversification across service lines.
- The firm’s operating profile is highly partner-dependent, with 4 partners generating $8.0M of gross revenue and $2.0M of revenue per partner, which can create key-person and transition risk if any partner’s contribution changes.
- Staffing appears lean relative to scale, with 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, which may constrain capacity, increase utilization pressure, and limit scalability.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also suggests valuation sensitivity to any normalization in compensation, overhead, or utilization assumptions.
- The practice data is empty, so there is no evidence of recurring specialty mix or other stabilizing practice diversification to support the revenue base.