- Consulting is the largest revenue stream at 56% of gross revenue, indicating a meaningful advisory mix relative to the firm’s overall $8.0 million revenue base.
- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue with 4 partners, equating to $2.0 million of revenue per partner, which is a material productivity metric for valuation analysis.
- EBITDA before owner compensation is 50%, suggesting strong pre-owner-compensation earnings relative to revenue.
- The practice has 30,000 billable hours, showing a substantial volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- Audit and tax each contribute 22% of revenue, providing diversified recurring compliance work alongside the larger consulting segment.
- EBOC at 50% indicates only half of revenue is available after owner compensation, which limits valuation relative to firms with higher profitability.
- The firm has 56% of revenue in consulting, creating a relatively concentrated service mix that may warrant a discount versus a more balanced practice.
- With just 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm is a small platform, which can constrain scale and reduce buyer flexibility in integration.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 suggests meaningful partner dependence, increasing key-person risk for a buyer.
- Increase audit and tax mix from the current 22% each by expanding recurring compliance work, which could reduce reliance on consulting-heavy revenue and improve revenue stability.
- Leverage the high consulting concentration at 56% of revenue to deepen higher-value advisory offerings and support continued margin strength, given the 50% EBOC margin.
- Build scale through the 20-person team and 30,000 billable hours to improve leverage and utilization across the four-partner structure, supporting higher revenue per partner.
- Use the relatively young partner group, with partner ages around 32, to extend the firm’s growth runway and support longer-term continuity and value creation.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting at 56% of gross revenue, so valuation may be more sensitive to any slowdown in that service line.
- The firm has only four partners, which creates key-person and succession risk because a relatively small number of owners support the entire practice.
- Revenue per partner of 2.0 million is high relative to the 20-person staff base, suggesting operational leverage and potential execution strain if workload or retention weakens.
- Audit and tax each represent 22% of revenue, leaving the firm with a mixed but still limited diversification profile that may increase earnings volatility if one service line underperforms.
- The partner age field shows 32, which may indicate a younger ownership group and therefore less immediate succession pressure, but also less evidence of mature transition planning from the data provided.