- Consulting is the largest revenue stream at 45% of gross revenue, indicating a meaningful advisory component in the mix.
- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a material scale point for valuation analysis.
- Revenue is diversified across consulting at 45%, tax at 33%, and audit at 22%, reducing dependence on any single service line.
- EBITDA before owner compensation is 50%, which indicates strong reported profitability before partner pay.
- Revenue per partner is approximately $2.67 million across three partners, suggesting high revenue concentration at the partner level.
- EBOC of 50% suggests only moderate earnings conversion, which can limit valuation multiple support versus higher-margin firms.
- The firm has only 3 partners and 3 staff supporting $8.0 million of revenue, indicating a very thin operating base and potential execution risk that can constrain scalable growth.
- Revenue mix is weighted toward consulting at 45%, with audit at 22% and tax at 33%, creating service-line concentration that may make earnings less stable than a more balanced practice.
- Revenue per partner of $2.67 million is being generated with only three partners, indicating high partner dependence and a limited management bench for continuity and succession.
- Partner ages are shown only as 33, and with no older partner cohort disclosed the data provides limited evidence of near-term succession pressure, but also indicates the firm is very early in its partner lifecycle and may be less established in buyer diligence.
- Increase the audit share of revenue from its current 22% by building on the existing consulting-led mix, which could improve recurring work and broaden the revenue base.
- Expand the tax practice, currently 33% of revenue, to deepen client relationships and create cross-sell opportunities across the firm’s existing service lines.
- Leverage the strong consulting concentration at 45% of revenue to pursue higher-value advisory work and support margin expansion, given the reported 50% EBOC margin.
- Improve operating leverage by adding staff beyond the current 3 partners and 3 staff, as the present structure suggests limited capacity to scale billable hours and revenue.
- Build on the firm’s high revenue per partner of about 2.7 million to support premium positioning and selective growth in larger engagements.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting at 45% of gross revenue, so the earnings base may be more sensitive to changes in that service line than a more balanced mix.
- The firm has only 3 partners and 3 staff, which suggests limited operating depth and potential key-person dependency for delivery and continuity.
- With 30,000 billable hours across just 6 total professionals, the workload appears heavily reliant on a small team, increasing execution and capacity strain risk.
- Partner ages are shown as 33, indicating a relatively young ownership group and possible succession or retention uncertainty if the current team changes.
- EBOC at 50% is solid but leaves limited cushion if margins soften, which can materially affect valuation in a small firm with concentrated staffing.