- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is the most material top-line strength in the data set.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating a high level of partner productivity relative to the firm’s current ownership base.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, providing a meaningful volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates that half of gross revenue remains after operating costs and is a clear margin metric for valuation analysis.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, a compact operating structure that can be attractive from a buyer’s integration and governance perspective.
- EBOC is 50%, which leaves only moderate earnings conversion and can cap valuation relative to higher-margin firms.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 across just 4 partners, creating meaningful key-person and partner-dependency risk for a buyer.
- The firm has only 20 staff against 30,000 billable hours, indicating a relatively small operating platform that may limit scale and capacity.
- Partner ages are 30, suggesting a younger leadership group with limited tenure visibility for succession assessment from a buyer’s perspective.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0M level by improving partner leverage and delegating more work to staff, given 4 partners and 20 staff.
- Expand billable hours beyond the current 30,000 to support top-line growth without adding proportionate partner count, leveraging the existing staffing base.
- Preserve and potentially improve the 50% EBOC margin through disciplined pricing and workload mix management, as margin is already a strong valuation support.
- Build scale by increasing firm size and depth under the current partner group, since the firm’s 4-partner structure suggests room to spread leadership and client delivery across more personnel.
- The firm’s EBOC margin of 50% is solid but still leaves meaningful earnings sensitivity if billing realization or overhead efficiency weakens, which can affect valuation durability.
- With only 4 partners and $2.0 million of revenue per partner, the business is relatively concentrated at the partner level, increasing key-person and succession execution risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.
- The 30,000 billable hours supported by 20 staff imply a modest staffing base for an $8.0 million practice, so capacity constraints or turnover could quickly pressure delivery and growth.
- The partner age data shows 30, but the JSON does not indicate a broader succession pipeline, so continuity risk may remain if the current partner group is not deep enough to absorb future transitions.