- The firm generates $8.0M of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating transaction size and integration economics.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0M, indicating a high level of partner productivity relative to the four-partner structure.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, providing a substantial volume of chargeable work to support recurring revenue generation.
- EBOC is 50%, which suggests a material portion of revenue is retained after operating costs and is relevant to valuation analysis.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting four partners, giving it a 5:1 staff-to-partner ratio that can support delivery capacity.
- EBITDA/EBOC margin is only 50%, which limits owner earnings available to support valuation and debt capacity.
- The firm has 4 partners generating $2,000,000 of revenue per partner, indicating relatively concentrated production at the partner level.
- With only 20 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, the firm’s scale is modest, which can constrain operational depth and transactionability.
- Partner ages are 30, so the firm appears early in partner lifecycle and may offer limited near-term retirement-driven transition opportunity for a buyer.
- Increase partner leverage by expanding the 20-person staff base relative to 4 partners, which could support higher billable-hour capacity and revenue growth without proportional partner headcount growth.
- Improve profitability from the current 50% EBOC margin by tightening delivery efficiency and pricing discipline, creating direct valuation upside through stronger earnings quality.
- Scale billable production above the current 30,000 billable hours by adding capacity and improving utilization, which would better monetize the firm’s existing revenue base.
- Build on the $2.0 million revenue per partner level by increasing non-partner execution capacity, allowing partners to focus more on higher-value client development and oversight.
- Use the relatively young partner group age of 30 to support a longer growth runway and succession planning, which can enhance continuity and reduce key-person risk over time.
- At $8.0M of gross revenue supported by 4 partners, the firm is highly dependent on a small leadership group, which increases key-person and succession risk if any partner reduces involvement or exits.
- The partner age field shows 30, but with no evidence of a broader next-generation bench, the data suggests limited visible succession depth relative to the current partner-led structure.
- With 20 staff generating 30,000 billable hours, the firm averages about 1,500 billable hours per employee, which may indicate limited operating leverage or underutilized capacity if demand softens.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is strong, but it also means each partner carries a large share of firm economics, so partner-level disruption could have an outsized valuation impact.
- An EBOC margin of 50% is healthy, but it still leaves half of revenue consumed by operating costs, so profitability could compress quickly if staffing or overhead rises faster than revenue.