- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a material revenue base from a buyer’s valuation perspective.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, indicating a scalable operating structure with meaningful labor capacity behind the revenue base.
- Revenue is diversified across audit, consulting, and tax, with each shown at 70% in the provided data, suggesting multiple service lines are represented in the firm’s mix.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, which provides direct evidence of substantial production volume.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates a defined earnings profile that can be evaluated in valuation work.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a useful productivity metric for assessing partner-level economics.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate earnings conversion, which can pressure valuation compared with higher-margin firms.
- Revenue is concentrated across audit, tax, and consulting at 70% each, suggesting limited service-line diversification and potential overlap in the reported mix.
- With only 4 partners and $2,000,000 of revenue per partner, the firm is relatively partner-driven, which can raise succession and retention risk for a buyer.
- The firm has 20 staff against 4 partners, implying a small operating base that may limit scale and post-close leverage opportunities.
- Increase revenue per partner by leveraging the firm’s $8.0M gross revenue across 4 partners, which currently implies $2.0M per partner and suggests room to improve scale and partner productivity.
- Improve profitability by converting the 50% EBOC margin into higher earnings through better pricing, utilization, or mix management, as supported by the current margin data.
- Optimize service mix around the firm’s 70% audit revenue and 70% tax revenue concentrations to reduce dependence on any single line and support more balanced growth.
- Expand consulting contribution from the current 70% consulting revenue base by deepening higher-value advisory work, which could enhance valuation through a more favorable mix.
- Build operating leverage by using the 20-person staff base more efficiently across the 30,000 billable hours, which may improve throughput and support growth without proportional headcount increases.
- Revenue is heavily concentrated in audit and tax work, with audit_revenue_percent at 70% and tax_revenue_percent at 70%, which may limit diversification and make earnings more dependent on a narrow service mix.
- The firm’s scale appears modest relative to its partner group, with gross_revenue of $8.0M across 4 partners and revenue_per_partner of $2.0M, which can constrain operating leverage and succession flexibility.
- Staffing is relatively lean at 20 staff versus 4 partners, creating a high partner-to-staff ratio that may increase key-person dependence and limit capacity for growth or transition.
- Partner ages are all listed as 20, suggesting the age data may be unreliable or incomplete, which reduces confidence in succession and continuity assessment.
- EBOC percent of 50% indicates only moderate earnings conversion, leaving limited cushion if margins come under pressure or if partner compensation needs rise.