- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale from a valuation perspective.
- Revenue is concentrated in recurring core service lines, with audit, tax, and consulting each representing 70% of revenue as reported in the data.
- The practice has 30,000 billable hours, indicating substantial operating volume.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that supports current revenue production.
- Derived revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a material productivity metric for buyer analysis.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate earnings conversion, which can constrain valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 across only 4 partners suggests the business is highly partner-dependent and may face key-person/succession risk if any partner exits.
- The firm has only 20 staff against 4 partners and 30,000 total billable hours, which points to a relatively small operating platform that may limit scalability.
- Audit revenue, tax revenue, and consulting revenue are each 70%, indicating overlapping concentration in the same core service lines and limited evidence of meaningful diversification.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0M level by expanding capacity, delegation, or partner leverage across the 4-partner, 20-staff platform.
- Improve profitability by lifting the 50% EBOC margin through tighter cost control and better operating leverage on the $8.0M revenue base.
- Broaden and balance the service mix, as the firm is heavily concentrated in audit and tax at 70% each and consulting at 70%, which suggests room to deepen higher-value advisory work if supported by existing capabilities.
- Scale billable output from the current 30,000 billable hours by improving utilization and throughput across the 20-person staff base.
- Position for continuity and transition value by addressing the concentrated partner age profile, with all four partners at age 20 as provided in the data.
- The firm appears highly concentrated in a small partner group, with 4 partners and all partner ages shown as 20, which may create succession and continuity risk if any partner departs or is unable to work.
- Staffing capacity may be tight relative to scale, with 20 staff supporting $8.0M of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which could pressure delivery quality and scalability during busy periods.
- Revenue mix is heavily weighted toward audit, tax, and consulting at 70% each in the provided data, suggesting limited diversification across service lines and potential earnings volatility if any one service line softens.
- EBOC is 50% of gross revenue, which is solid but still leaves meaningful sensitivity to margin compression from labor cost increases or utilization declines.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0M, indicating the firm’s economics are dependent on a relatively small number of owners and may be exposed to partner-level productivity changes.