- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a material revenue base for valuation analysis.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating substantial partner-level production relative to the four-partner structure.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, providing evidence of meaningful operating scale and workload volume.
- EBOC is 50%, which is a clear profitability metric that supports valuation discussions.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 4 partners, showing a staffed operating model with leverage behind partner production.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only half of gross revenue is converting to owner-level earnings, which pressures valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- The firm’s scale is modest at $8,000,000 of gross revenue, which can limit buyer flexibility and reduce attractiveness relative to larger platforms.
- With only 4 partners, revenue is concentrated in a small ownership group, creating succession and transition sensitivity if any partner departs.
- A staff base of 20 against 30,000 total billable hours suggests a relatively lean operating footprint, which may constrain capacity to absorb growth without additional hiring.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 is solid, but the low partner count means that key relationships and production are more likely to be concentrated at the partner level.
- With 50% EBOC on $8.0M of gross revenue, there is room to improve operating leverage and expand EBITDA through tighter cost control and productivity gains.
- At 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff and 4 partners, the firm may be able to increase revenue by improving capacity utilization and converting more staff hours into billable work.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M suggests an opportunity to deepen partner leverage by delegating more execution to staff and focusing partners on higher-value client development and oversight.
- The current 4-partner structure provides a platform to scale by adding capacity or succession depth, which could support growth without proportionate increases in partner concentration.
- With partner ages at 30, the firm has a long runway to build value through sustained growth and compounding of client relationships over time.
- The firm’s EBOC margin of 50% on $8.0M gross revenue suggests profitability is solid but still leaves meaningful earnings sensitivity if billing or utilization softens.
- With 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff, the practice depends on a relatively concentrated labor base, so any staffing disruption or productivity decline could materially affect throughput.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M across 4 partners indicates earnings generation is concentrated at the partner level, which can create succession and continuity risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.
- The reported partner age of 30 suggests a younger ownership group, which may imply limited near-term succession pressure but also less established long-term transition history for a buyer to underwrite.