- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is material at the transaction level.
- Revenue is concentrated in recurring compliance work, with audit, tax, and consulting each representing 70% of revenue as provided in the data.
- The practice produces 30,000 billable hours, indicating a meaningful operating scale.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a 5:1 staff-to-partner ratio that supports delivery capacity.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a useful valuation metric for assessing partner productivity.
- EBOC is 50%, providing a clear profitability indicator for buyer underwriting.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating only half of gross revenue is converting to owner earnings before compensation and creating limited margin support for valuation.
- Revenue is concentrated across Audit, Tax, and Consulting at 70% each, which points to heavy dependence on a narrow service mix rather than a diversified revenue base.
- The firm produces $2,000,000 of revenue per partner with only 4 partners, which can increase key-person dependency and reduce transferability of earnings if partner production is not retained.
- With 30,000 billable hours and 20 staff, the firm has about 1,500 billable hours per staff member, which may indicate a relatively modest scale base for spreading overhead and supporting valuation multiples.
- Improve revenue mix by expanding the consulting and tax practices, as both are already 70% of revenue and can support higher-value service lines if scaled further.
- Increase operating leverage by growing the 20-person staff base relative to 4 partners, which could raise partner productivity and support additional billable hours beyond the current 30,000.
- Enhance profitability by lifting the 50% EBOC margin through tighter pricing, utilization, and delivery discipline, which would directly improve valuation.
- Reduce key-person concentration risk by developing succession depth around the four partners, whose ages are all listed as 20, to support continuity and transferability.
- Build scale from the current $8.0 million gross revenue base and $2.0 million revenue per partner, which may improve marketability and broaden acquisition appeal.
- The firm appears highly concentrated in a small partner group, with 4 partners and all partner ages shown as 20, which creates key-person and succession risk if continuity or retention changes.
- Staffing may be tight relative to scale, with 20 staff supporting $8.0M of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which could pressure delivery capacity and limit scalability.
- Profitability appears only moderate, with EBOC at 50% of gross revenue, leaving less cushion for compensation, reinvestment, and valuation support than a higher-margin practice.
- Revenue mix is heavily weighted to audit, consulting, and tax at 70% each in the provided fields, indicating the practice may be dependent on a narrow set of service lines rather than a more diversified mix.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is strong but also suggests meaningful reliance on each partner’s production, which can increase transition risk in a transaction or post-close integration.