- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a material scale point for valuation analysis.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, indicating a defined operating structure with meaningful personnel depth.
- Revenue is concentrated in core accounting services, with audit at 70% of revenue and tax at 70% of revenue, supporting a clear service mix for buyers to underwrite.
- Consulting also represents 70% of revenue, showing that the firm has a substantial advisory component alongside compliance work.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, providing a concrete workload base for assessing capacity and utilization.
- EBOC is 50%, which gives a direct indicator of earnings conversion for valuation purposes.
- EBOC of 50% indicates a mid-range profitability profile that may cap valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Revenue is concentrated across all three service lines at 70% each, suggesting limited mix diversification and potential dependence on a small set of offerings.
- The firm has only 4 partners generating $2,000,000 of revenue per partner, which may indicate limited scale for a buyer relative to larger platforms.
- With 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, the staffing base is relatively lean and may constrain absorption of growth without added capacity.
- Partner ages are all listed as 20, which provides no evidence of near-term succession risk and therefore does not support a valuation weakness.
- Increase revenue per partner by improving leverage across the 4-partner, 20-staff platform, as current revenue per partner is $2.0M on $8.0M of gross revenue.
- Improve profitability by lifting EBOC from 50% through better pricing, staffing mix, or delivery efficiency, since the current margin level is explicitly provided.
- Reduce concentration risk and broaden the revenue base by balancing the current service mix, which is heavily weighted to audit and tax at 70% each and consulting at 70% as reported in the data.
- Use the 30,000 billable hours and existing staff base to expand capacity and scale without immediate partner additions, supporting higher throughput and valuation.
- Position for continuity and transition value by planning around the four partners’ similar ages of 20, which may support orderly succession and preserve enterprise value.
- The firm’s revenue is heavily skewed toward a single service line, with audit revenue at 70% and tax revenue also at 70%, which suggests limited diversification in the revenue base.
- Consulting revenue is also shown at 70%, indicating the service-mix data is internally inconsistent and therefore reduces confidence in the underlying reporting used for valuation analysis.
- The partner group is very young at age 20 for all four partners, which creates succession and continuity risk because the ownership base appears early in career and may not yet be stable.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm’s staffing base is relatively lean for $8.0 million of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which can increase key-person dependency and execution risk.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million is high relative to the small partner group, which may indicate concentration of production and transition risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.