- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale indicator for a buyer evaluating transaction size.
- Tax work represents 70% of revenue, providing a clear core service concentration that can support valuation visibility.
- Consulting contributes 30% of revenue, giving the practice a diversified service mix beyond tax alone.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, indicating a substantial volume of productive work supporting current revenue levels.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm shows a defined operating structure that a buyer can underwrite against the reported revenue base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a useful productivity metric from a buyer’s valuation perspective.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate profitability, which can pressure valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Tax work represents 70% of gross revenue, creating a material service-line concentration that limits diversification.
- The firm has only 4 partners and 20 staff, which suggests a relatively small operating scale and may limit buyer synergies.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 implies meaningful dependence on a small partner group, increasing key-person and succession risk given the limited partner count.
- Consulting is only 30% of revenue, so the practice remains weighted toward tax and may have less mix balance than a more diversified platform.
- Increase the consulting revenue mix from 30% by expanding higher-value advisory work, which could improve growth and valuation multiple relative to the current tax-heavy mix.
- Leverage the firm’s specialized niches in HNW, Real Estate, and Consumer Products to deepen expertise and support more differentiated, higher-margin client work.
- Build succession and leadership continuity around the four-partner structure and partner age of 54 to reduce key-person risk and support a smoother transition in value.
- Improve operating leverage by scaling the 20-person staff base against $8.0 million of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which may enhance profitability and partner productivity.
- Use the firm’s $2.0 million revenue per partner as a benchmark to identify opportunities for cross-selling and capacity expansion within existing client relationships.
- At 20 staff supporting $8.0 million of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the firm may be operationally stretched, which can create execution and capacity risk if demand increases or key personnel are unavailable.
- The partner group is concentrated in only 4 partners with a stated age of 54, which can create succession and continuity risk if ownership transition planning is not well developed.
- Revenue is 70% tax-related and 30% consulting, so performance is materially tied to a single dominant service line, limiting diversification and increasing sensitivity to any slowdown in tax work.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million is strong, but it also indicates meaningful dependence on each partner’s productivity, which can pressure valuation if any partner reduces involvement or departs.
- The firm’s specialized niches in HNW, Real Estate, and Consumer Products suggest a focused practice mix, which can be attractive but may also constrain breadth of recurring opportunities relative to a more diversified platform.