- Consulting work represents 60% of revenue, indicating a revenue mix with a majority of higher-value advisory services.
- The firm generates $4.5 million of gross revenue, giving a meaningful scale for a four-partner practice.
- Revenue per partner is $1.125 million, which is a useful productivity metric from a buyer’s valuation perspective.
- EBOC is 48% of revenue, showing a substantial earnings margin before owner compensation and taxes.
- The practice includes specialized niches in closely held businesses, family offices, and international work, which can support differentiated service lines.
- EBOC of 48% indicates a moderate profit margin relative to revenue, which can limit valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- The firm has only 4 partners versus 13 staff, creating a small ownership base that can constrain management depth and increase key-person dependence.
- All partners are age 60, which creates a clear succession and transition risk that buyers will likely discount in valuation.
- With $1.125 million of revenue per partner, the practice is relatively concentrated at the partner level, which can heighten transition risk if any partner exits.
- The practice is 60% consulting and 40% tax, so a meaningful portion of revenue is tied to consulting work rather than a more recurring tax-only mix, which can affect buyer perception of stability.
- Increase the consulting mix, which already represents 60% of revenue, to support higher-value advisory work and improve valuation quality relative to compliance-heavy revenue.
- Leverage the strong 48% EBOC margin to demonstrate operating efficiency and create room for reinvestment in talent, technology, or partner transition support.
- Build on the specialized niche focus in closely held businesses, family offices, and international clients to deepen expertise and strengthen pricing power.
- Address succession and continuity risk by planning around the four-partner group, including the stated partner age of 60, to protect client retention and enterprise value.
- Scale the firm’s 22,500 billable hours across 13 staff to improve leverage and reduce key-person dependence while maintaining the current revenue base.
- The firm appears highly partner-dependent, with only 4 partners supporting $4.5 million of gross revenue and $1.125 million of revenue per partner, which can create key-person and succession risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.
- Partner age is reported at 60, which increases the likelihood of near- to medium-term transition pressure and potential disruption to client relationships and operating continuity.
- The staffing base is relatively lean at 13 staff against 22,500 billable hours, suggesting limited capacity to absorb growth, backfill departures, or manage workload spikes without service strain.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting at 60% and tax at 40%, so the firm lacks meaningful diversification across service lines and may be more exposed to swings in demand within its current mix.
- The practice is focused on closely held businesses, family offices, and international work, which may require specialized expertise and can make the firm more dependent on a narrow set of capabilities and partner relationships.