- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting revenue (100%), giving the buyer a fully focused service mix with no disclosed non-consulting dependency.
- EBOC is 50% of revenue, indicating a high operating margin profile on the reported financials.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, showing a substantial volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that can support the reported revenue level.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a material productivity metric from a valuation perspective.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate profitability, which can limit valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Consulting revenue is 100%, creating full service-line concentration and leaving the firm entirely dependent on one category of work.
- The firm generates $2,000,000 of revenue per partner across only 4 partners, so buyer risk is concentrated in a small ownership base.
- With 20 staff against 4 partners, the firm’s scale is modest, which can constrain operational leverage and post-close integration flexibility.
- Maintain and protect the 50% EBOC margin, as the current profitability level is a clear valuation support and leaves room for disciplined growth without sacrificing earnings quality.
- Increase revenue per partner from $2.0 million by leveraging the existing 30,000 billable hours across only 4 partners, which suggests meaningful capacity to scale output before adding partner headcount.
- Expand the 20-person staff base to better support the current consulting-only revenue mix, improving leverage and allowing partners to focus on higher-value client work.
- Preserve the 100% consulting revenue concentration while broadening delivery depth within the existing practice, since the current mix indicates a focused platform that can be scaled efficiently.
- Use the relatively young partner group (age 32) to build longer operating runway and support a longer-term growth trajectory, which can enhance buyer confidence in continuity and future earnings durability.
- Revenue is entirely consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), so the firm lacks service-line diversification and is more exposed to any slowdown in consulting demand or pricing pressure.
- The firm’s scale is modest at $8.0M gross revenue with only 4 partners and 20 staff, which can limit operating resilience and make overhead absorption and succession execution more sensitive to personnel changes.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0M, indicating meaningful dependence on a small partner group, so the loss or underperformance of even one partner could have an outsized impact on earnings and continuity.
- Billable hours of 30,000 across 20 staff suggest a relatively lean delivery base, which may constrain capacity for growth and increase key-person workload risk if utilization rises further.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also means valuation is highly sensitive to maintaining current profitability levels, leaving less room for margin compression without affecting returns materially.