- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale from a buyer’s valuation perspective.
- All revenue is consulting revenue at 100%, giving the firm a fully service-based revenue mix with no disclosed non-consulting dependency.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating a high disclosed earnings margin relative to revenue.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, supporting a substantial level of productive capacity.
- With 4 partners and derived revenue per partner of $2.0 million, the firm shows a concentrated partner economics profile.
- The practice reports 21 specialized niches, indicating a broad set of disclosed specialty areas within the firm.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates only half of revenue remains before owner compensation and can limit valuation on a normalized earnings basis.
- The firm is entirely consulting-based at 100% consulting revenue, creating a single-service-line concentration that can compress the buyer pool and reduce multiple expansion.
- Revenue is spread across 21 specialized niches on only $8,000,000 of gross revenue, suggesting a fragmented niche mix that may limit scale and make the platform harder to integrate and market.
- The firm has just 20 staff supporting 4 partners and $8,000,000 of revenue, a relatively lean operating base that may constrain capacity for growth or transition risk management.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 with only 4 partners, so the business appears partner-dependent and buyers may discount for succession and retention risk if any partner exits.
- Maintain and defend the 50% EBOC margin, as the current profitability level provides meaningful valuation support and room to preserve earnings quality while scaling.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0 million by leveraging the 30,000 billable hours across a 4-partner platform, indicating capacity to improve partner productivity and scale.
- Deepen and package the 21 specialized niches into a more focused service mix to strengthen differentiation and support pricing power in valuation discussions.
- Expand consulting revenue generation within the existing 100% consulting revenue base by converting the firm’s specialized niche breadth into higher-value engagements and greater client concentration resilience.
- Improve leverage by increasing staff utilization relative to the 4-partner structure and 20-person team, which could enhance throughput without proportionate partner growth.
- The firm’s scale is modest at $8.0M gross revenue with 4 partners and 20 staff, which can limit depth, succession flexibility, and operating resilience if one or more key professionals are unavailable.
- Revenue is generated entirely from consulting (100% consulting revenue), creating a single-service-line dependency that may make earnings more sensitive to changes in demand for that offering.
- The practice is spread across 21 specialized niches, which can dilute focus and make it harder to build repeatable delivery, efficient staffing, and strong market positioning in any one area.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is solid, but with only 30,000 billable hours and 20 staff, the model may be exposed if utilization or staffing efficiency weakens.
- The partner age field shows 32, which suggests a relatively young partner group and may indicate limited near-term retirement-driven succession support, increasing the need for deliberate long-term leadership development.