- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting revenue (100%), which gives the practice a fully service-based revenue mix.
- The firm reports $4.0 million of EBOC at a 50% margin, indicating a substantial earnings base relative to revenue.
- With 30,000 billable hours, the practice shows a sizable volume of productive utilization supporting current revenue.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, suggesting a manageable operating structure for integration.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a strong productivity metric on a per-partner basis.
- EBOC is only 50%, which limits earnings quality and leaves relatively little profit cushion for a buyer.
- The firm is 100% consulting revenue, creating complete service-line concentration and no recurring diversification evident in the data.
- With only 4 partners generating $8,000,000 of revenue, the practice shows meaningful partner dependence and key-person concentration.
- Partner ages are 32, which provides no near-term succession event support in the data and may imply a younger leadership bench rather than an established transition profile.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 suggests the business is highly concentrated at the partner level, increasing buyer sensitivity to partner retention and continuity.
- Maintain and expand the 100% consulting revenue mix to preserve the firm’s higher-margin positioning, as supported by the 50% EBOC margin.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0 million level by improving partner leverage and delegation across the 20-person staff base.
- Scale billable hours above the current 30,000 level through better utilization of existing capacity, which could support revenue growth without immediate partner count expansion.
- Use the relatively young partner group (age 32) to build a longer-duration leadership runway, supporting continuity and future growth capacity.
- Improve operating leverage by increasing the ratio of staff to partners, which may enhance throughput and support higher gross revenue from the existing platform.
- At $8.0M of gross revenue supported by only 4 partners, the firm shows a high revenue-per-partner level of $2.0M, which can increase key-person dependency and make continuity more sensitive to partner availability or departure.
- The firm has only 20 staff against 4 partners, indicating a relatively lean operating structure that may constrain capacity, succession depth, and scalability if workload increases or a partner steps back.
- All revenue is consulting-based at 100% of gross revenue, so the business lacks service-line diversification and is more exposed to performance swings within a single offering.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also suggests valuation may be more dependent on maintaining current operating efficiency than on broad-based scale or diversification.
- With partner ages reported as 32, the firm appears to have a young partner group, which may imply limited near-term succession pressure but also less evidence of a mature, multi-generation ownership transition plan.