- The firm generates $4.0 million of gross revenue, providing a meaningful revenue base for a buyer to underwrite.
- Revenue is evenly split between consulting and tax at 50% each, which indicates a diversified service mix rather than reliance on a single line of business.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, showing a substantial level of chargeable activity supporting the reported revenue.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that can support delivery across its service lines.
- Revenue per partner is $1.0 million, which is a clear productivity metric buyers can use in valuation analysis.
- At $4.0 million of gross revenue and only 20 staff, the firm is relatively small, which can limit operating leverage and buyer scale benefits.
- With only 4 partners generating $1.0 million of revenue per partner, the business appears partner-dependent, increasing succession and continuity risk for a buyer.
- Partner ages are 61, which signals near-term succession risk and potential transition-related retention issues.
- Revenue is split 50% tax and 50% consulting, creating a concentrated two-practice mix that may reduce valuation flexibility if either service line underperforms.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates only moderate profitability and may constrain valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Increase consulting mix and related advisory work, as consulting already represents 50% of revenue and can support higher-growth, higher-value service expansion.
- Improve profitability through margin management, as EBOC is 50% of revenue, indicating room to enhance operating leverage and valuation quality.
- Build succession and transition value ahead of partner retirement risk, as the firm has 4 partners with a stated age of 61, which may affect continuity and buyer confidence.
- Expand scale per partner, as revenue per partner is $1.0 million and the firm has 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff, suggesting room to improve throughput and leverage.
- Reduce concentration in tax work by broadening the service mix, as tax revenue is 50% of revenue and a more balanced mix may support more resilient growth.
- Partner age of 61 with only 4 partners creates near-term succession and continuity risk if ownership transition is not planned and executed smoothly.
- The firm’s 50% consulting revenue mix may make earnings less predictable than a more recurring compliance-heavy practice, increasing valuation sensitivity to revenue volatility.
- With 20 staff supporting $4.0M of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the firm appears operationally dependent on a relatively lean team, which can elevate key-person and capacity risk.
- Revenue of $4.0M across 4 partners implies $1.0M revenue per partner, so any partner departure or slowdown could have an outsized impact on production and firm value.
- EBOC at 50% indicates that half of gross revenue remains after operating costs, leaving limited room for margin compression if staffing, compensation, or overhead increase.