- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating a high level of partner productivity relative to the four-partner structure.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, showing a substantial volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and other items.
- The partner group is relatively young at age 30, which may support longer continuity of ownership and transition planning.
- EBITDA/EBOC at 50% indicates a 50% margin profile, which may limit upside on a buyer’s post-close economics if the multiple is applied to a lower-than-top-quartile profitability base.
- With only 4 partners and $2,000,000 of revenue per partner, the firm appears relatively small at the partner level, which can constrain scale and increase key-person exposure in a transaction.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, a staffing base that may limit near-term capacity expansion without additional hiring.
- Partner ages of 30 suggest a very young leadership group, which can raise succession and retention risk if the buyer expects a longer-horizon transition of client and leadership responsibilities.
- Improve operating leverage and scalability by increasing revenue per partner, which is currently $2.0M across 4 partners on $8.0M of gross revenue.
- Expand billable capacity and utilization by growing beyond the current 30,000 billable hours with 20 staff, supporting higher revenue without proportional partner growth.
- Preserve and potentially enhance the strong 50% EBOC margin, which supports valuation and suggests room to convert scale gains into profit.
- Develop the firm’s partner bench and succession depth, as the current partner group is small at 4 partners and the age field is only partially specified at 30, indicating limited visible depth in the provided data.
- At $8.0M of gross revenue and only 4 partners, the firm is highly dependent on a small leadership base, which can create key-person and succession risk if one partner’s capacity or continuity changes.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M is relatively high versus the 20 staff members, suggesting the platform may be stretched and could face execution risk if growth or workload increases without added depth.
- With 30,000 billable hours across 20 staff, the firm averages about 1,500 billable hours per staff member, which may indicate limited operating slack and potential vulnerability to turnover or utilization swings.
- The firm’s 50% EBOC margin is solid but leaves only moderate cushion, so any increase in compensation, staffing, or overhead could pressure earnings and valuation.