- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue with only one partner, implying a high revenue concentration per partner of $8.0 million.
- The practice produces 30,000 billable hours, indicating a meaningful operating base of client work.
- Audit revenue represents 70% of total revenue, providing a clearly defined core service line.
- Tax revenue also represents 70% of total revenue, showing a substantial recurring compliance component.
- Consulting revenue represents 70% of total revenue, indicating a material advisory component alongside compliance work.
- EBOC is 50%, which provides a clear margin benchmark for valuation analysis.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates a mid-level earnings profile that may support a lower valuation multiple versus higher-margin firms.
- The firm has only 1 partner generating $8,000,000 of revenue, creating key-person and succession risk because ownership and client relationships appear highly concentrated.
- Audit, tax, and consulting each represent 70% of revenue, showing an unusually heavy mix concentration that can increase valuation risk if the percentages reflect overlapping dependency on a narrow book of business.
- With 30,000 total billable hours and 20 staff, the firm’s scale is modest, which can limit operating leverage and reduce buyer flexibility in absorbing transition or integration costs.
- Reduce key-person concentration by building a broader partner bench, as the firm currently has 1 partner supporting $8.0M of gross revenue.
- Improve leverage and scalability by expanding the 20-person staff base relative to the single-partner structure, which may support higher throughput and lower dependence on partner time.
- Increase value through service-line diversification, since revenue is concentrated in audit (70%) and tax (70%) with no other practice areas shown in the data.
- Enhance margin and valuation by improving efficiency on the 30,000 billable hours base and the 50% EBOC level, indicating room to convert workload into stronger earnings.
- Strengthen succession visibility given the partner age field of 20 and the one-partner structure, which may limit continuity and buyer confidence if not addressed.
- The firm is highly dependent on a single partner, with 1 partner supporting $8.0M of gross revenue and $8.0M of revenue per partner, creating key-person and succession risk.
- Staffing appears lean relative to scale, with 20 staff generating $8.0M of revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which may indicate capacity strain and execution risk if demand or turnover increases.
- Revenue mix is concentrated in audit and tax, each at 70% of revenue, limiting diversification and making earnings more sensitive to any slowdown in those core service lines.
- Consulting is also shown at 70% of revenue, suggesting the service-mix data is overlapping or inconsistent and reducing confidence in the underlying revenue composition for valuation analysis.
- The partner age field shows '20', but with only one partner this still leaves the firm exposed to succession uncertainty because no additional partner bench is evident in the data.