- The firm generates $1.7 million of gross revenue with only 2 partners, implying $850,000 of revenue per partner.
- The practice produces 28,000 billable hours, indicating a meaningful level of fee-earning capacity.
- Tax work represents 69% of revenue, providing a clear core service mix anchored in tax.
- Consulting contributes 31% of revenue, giving the firm a diversified non-tax revenue stream.
- EBOC is 74%, which supports a relatively high earnings conversion profile on the reported financials.
- EBOC of 74% suggests margins are not exceptional for a firm of this size, which can cap valuation upside for a buyer focused on profitability.
- Revenue is concentrated in tax work at 69%, creating service-line dependence that may limit diversification value and make earnings more sensitive to tax-market demand.
- The firm has only 2 partners supporting $1.7 million of revenue, which increases key-person dependence and succession risk from a buyer’s perspective.
- Increase the consulting mix from 31% of revenue to improve service-line diversification and support higher-value advisory work relative to tax-only revenue.
- Leverage the strong 74% EBOC margin by maintaining pricing discipline and operational efficiency, preserving the firm’s attractive profitability profile.
- Build scale beyond the current 2-partner, 17-staff structure to reduce key-person concentration and improve operating leverage as the firm grows.
- Plan for partner succession and continuity given the partners’ age of 53, which can support valuation by reducing transition risk.
- Expand billable hours from the current 28,000 base to spread fixed overhead across a larger revenue base and enhance revenue per partner, currently $850,000.
- With only 2 partners and one listed age of 53, the firm appears highly dependent on a small ownership base, which can create succession and continuity risk if one partner exits or reduces involvement.
- Revenue of $1.7M spread across just 2 partners implies $850K per partner, so any disruption at the partner level could have an outsized impact on earnings and client delivery capacity.
- The staff base of 17 against 28,000 billable hours suggests a relatively lean operating model, which may limit scalability and increase execution risk during periods of growth or turnover.
- Consulting revenue is 31% of gross revenue versus 69% tax revenue, indicating a meaningful but secondary service line mix that may be less stable if consulting demand softens or requires different capabilities than the core tax practice.