- Revenue is diversified across consulting (43%), tax (43%), and audit (34%), reducing reliance on a single service line.
- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale from a buyer’s perspective.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating that half of revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and other items.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across four partners, suggesting strong partner-level productivity.
- The firm has 30,000 billable hours, evidencing substantial annual delivery capacity.
- The partner group is relatively young, with ages of 24, 33, 34, and 43, which may support continuity over time.
- EBOC of 50% leaves only half of gross revenue available to support valuation after compensation and operating costs, which is a meaningful margin constraint for a buyer.
- The firm’s revenue mix is concentrated in tax (43%) and consulting (43%), with audit at 34%, creating a service-line profile that is not broadly diversified.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across only 4 partners, which indicates a small ownership base and can limit scale for a buyer relative to larger firms.
- The partner group is very young overall, with ages of 24, 33, 34, and 43, which raises execution and succession dependence on a narrow leadership bench relative to the firm’s size.
- Increase scale by leveraging the current four-partner structure and 20 staff base, as revenue per partner is already $2.0 million and could improve with additional throughput.
- Expand higher-value consulting work, which already represents 43% of revenue, to further support margin and valuation if the mix can be grown without diluting execution quality.
- Build on the existing tax practice, which also represents 43% of revenue, to deepen recurring client relationships and increase cross-sell into other service lines.
- Improve operating leverage by increasing billable hours across the 20-person team, since current revenue and EBOC levels suggest room to convert more capacity into profit.
- Preserve and optimize the audit platform, which is 34% of revenue, to maintain a balanced service mix while selectively growing more scalable advisory work.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting and tax work, with consulting at 43% and tax at 43% of revenue, which can create earnings sensitivity if either service line softens.
- The firm’s staffing base is relatively lean at 20 staff against 4 partners and 30,000 billable hours, which may limit capacity to absorb growth, turnover, or delivery spikes without added hiring.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million is high relative to the small partner group, increasing key-person dependence and making continuity more sensitive to partner availability or transition.
- EBOC at 50% indicates that half of gross revenue is consumed by operating costs, leaving a moderate margin profile that may constrain valuation if overhead rises or realization weakens.
- Audit represents only 34% of revenue, so the firm has a smaller audit base than its consulting and tax practices, which may reduce recurring assurance mix stability relative to a more audit-heavy firm.