- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating the platform.
- Revenue is diversified across consulting (43%), tax (43%), and audit (34%), reducing reliance on any single service line.
- The firm reports 50% EBOC, indicating a substantial share of revenue remains after owner compensation and is relevant to valuation.
- With 30,000 billable hours, the firm demonstrates a sizable operating base that supports current revenue generation.
- The firm has four partners and 20 staff, and the reported revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a material productivity metric for buyer analysis.
- Revenue per partner is only $2.0 million across four partners, which can indicate limited scale and higher dependence on a small partner group for production and client retention.
- The firm has just 20 staff against 30,000 billable hours, a relatively lean staffing base that may constrain capacity and increase key-person dependency.
- Audit revenue is 34% of gross revenue, so the practice is not strongly weighted toward assurance work and may present a less diversified, less recurring revenue profile to buyers.
- The partner group is relatively young, with ages ranging from 24 to 43, which can create succession and continuity concerns if current revenue production is concentrated in a small number of individuals.
- Increase scale and partner leverage, as $8.0M gross revenue across 4 partners implies $2.0M revenue per partner and suggests room to expand output without adding proportional partner count.
- Improve profitability by lifting the 50% EBOC margin through better pricing, mix management, or operating efficiency, since current earnings conversion is moderate relative to revenue.
- Deepen higher-value consulting work, which already represents 43% of revenue, to support stronger growth and potentially improve valuation through a more advisory-oriented mix.
- Optimize the tax practice mix, as tax revenue is 43% of revenue and can provide recurring client relationships that may support cross-sell and retention.
- Strengthen audit capacity and cross-sell, since audit revenue is 34% of revenue and could be expanded within the existing client base to balance the service mix and broaden revenue streams.
- At $8.0M of gross revenue across 4 partners, revenue per partner is $2.0M, which can indicate meaningful key-person dependence if one or more partners were to reduce involvement.
- The firm has only 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, suggesting a relatively lean staffing base that may create capacity and delivery risk as demand fluctuates.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting (43%), tax (43%), and audit (34%), so the business may be more exposed to shifts in any one service line than a more diversified practice.
- EBOC is 50% of gross revenue, which is solid but leaves limited cushion if compensation, staffing, or other operating costs rise.
- Partner ages of 24, 33, 34, and 43 indicate a relatively young partner group, which may imply shorter immediate succession risk but also a less mature leadership bench for continuity planning.