- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a material revenue base for valuation analysis.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that supports a meaningful service capacity.
- Revenue is concentrated in core accounting services, with audit at 70% and tax at 70% of revenue, indicating a clear service mix for buyers to underwrite.
- Consulting also represents 70% of revenue, showing an additional service line that is explicitly reflected in the financial data.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, providing a concrete workload metric that supports revenue production analysis.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a useful productivity metric for buyer valuation review.
- EBOC is only 50%, which points to a mid-range earnings conversion level that can cap valuation versus higher-margin firms.
- Revenue is concentrated across all three service lines—Audit 70%, Tax 70%, and Consulting 70%—indicating limited diversification in the reported revenue mix.
- With 30,000 total billable hours and $8,000,000 of gross revenue, the firm generates about $267 of revenue per billable hour, which may constrain pricing leverage relative to stronger-fee peers.
- Four partners share $8,000,000 of revenue, or $2,000,000 per partner, which suggests meaningful partner dependence for a firm of this size.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0 million level by expanding billable capacity or improving pricing and realization across the existing 30,000 billable hours base.
- Improve operating leverage and margin by scaling the 20-staff platform relative to four partners, which may support higher throughput without proportional partner growth.
- Diversify the revenue mix beyond the current 70% concentration in audit, consulting, and tax each, reducing dependence on any single service line and supporting a more balanced earnings profile.
- Strengthen succession and continuity value by planning around the four partners’ identical age profile, which can reduce key-person risk and support a smoother ownership transition.
- Expand higher-value advisory work within the existing consulting mix to lift earnings quality and potentially improve valuation multiples versus a more compliance-heavy profile.
- The firm appears highly dependent on a very small partner group, with 4 partners and all partner ages shown as 20, which raises succession and continuity risk if one or more partners are unavailable or depart.
- Staffing may be tight relative to scale, with 20 staff supporting $8.0M of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, which can create execution and capacity risk if utilization or retention weakens.
- Revenue mix is concentrated in a narrow set of service lines, with audit revenue at 70%, tax revenue at 70%, and consulting revenue at 70%, limiting diversification and making earnings more sensitive to changes in any one practice area.
- The firm’s EBOC margin is 50%, which is solid but still leaves meaningful exposure to margin compression if compensation, staffing, or overhead costs rise.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0M suggests the business is materially reliant on each partner’s production, increasing key-person risk and reducing resilience to partner-level disruption.