- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting-based at 100% consulting revenue, which indicates a fully service-oriented revenue mix.
- EBOC is 50% of revenue, showing a 50% operating margin before owner compensation and suggesting strong earnings conversion.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, evidencing substantial annual delivery capacity.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that supports the reported revenue base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating high productivity at the partner level.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates a relatively thin earnings margin and limits valuation support versus higher-margin firms.
- With 100% of revenue coming from consulting, the firm has no service-line diversification, increasing buyer exposure to concentration in a single offering.
- The practice is only $8,000,000 of gross revenue with 4 partners and 20 staff, which may constrain scale and make the platform less efficient to absorb buyer integration costs.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000, which can indicate partner-heavy revenue generation and a potentially limited capacity to scale without expanding the partner base.
- Increase revenue per partner by leveraging the current $2.0 million per-partner run rate and 50% EBOC margin to support higher-value pricing and/or greater throughput.
- Expand capacity utilization by increasing billable hours from the current 30,000 level, which would improve revenue generation without requiring a change in the firm’s consulting-only service mix.
- Build depth beyond the four-partner structure by adding senior staff leverage, as the current 20-person team suggests room to improve partner scalability and reduce key-person concentration.
- Preserve and optimize the 100% consulting revenue mix by focusing on higher-margin advisory work that can sustain the firm’s 50% EBOC profile while scaling.
- Strengthen succession and continuity planning early given the relatively young partner group at age 32, which can support longer-term value creation and reduce transition risk.
- All revenue is consulting-based (100% consulting_revenue_percent), which can make earnings more sensitive to utilization and project pipeline variability than a diversified fee mix.
- The firm’s scale is modest at $8.0M gross revenue with only 4 partners and 20 staff, which may limit operating depth and increase key-person dependency at the partner level.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0M, indicating a relatively concentrated production burden on each partner that can pressure continuity if one partner reduces involvement or exits.
- Billable hours of 30,000 across 20 staff implies roughly 1,500 billable hours per staff member, so maintaining the reported 50% EBOC may depend on sustained utilization and efficient staffing.
- The partner age field shows 32, which suggests a relatively young partner group and may imply a longer runway, but it also means the current ownership/leadership profile is still early in its maturity cycle.