- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting revenue at 100%, which indicates a fully service-based revenue mix with no disclosed non-consulting lines.
- EBOC is 50% of revenue, showing a high disclosed earnings margin relative to gross revenue.
- The practice produces 30,000 billable hours, evidencing a substantial operating volume.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that supports the reported revenue base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a material productivity metric from a valuation standpoint.
- At $2.0 million of revenue per partner across only 4 partners, the firm shows meaningful partner-level concentration and limited management depth, which increases key-person and succession risk for a buyer.
- With 100% of revenue coming from consulting, the firm lacks service-line diversification, making earnings more exposed to a single practice area and reducing revenue resiliency.
- The firm’s EBOC is 50%, which is a modest margin profile and can constrain valuation compared with higher-margin advisory businesses.
- Gross revenue of $8.0 million supported by only 20 staff suggests a relatively small operating platform, which may limit scalability and post-close absorption of growth.
- Increase partner leverage by expanding the 20-person staff base relative to 4 partners, which could support higher billable capacity and improve scalability.
- Improve revenue per partner, currently $2.0 million, by adding capacity and/or increasing throughput across the existing consulting platform.
- Preserve and potentially enhance the 50% EBOC margin through tighter utilization and delivery discipline, since the current profitability level is already strong and valuation-supportive.
- Build on the firm’s 100% consulting revenue mix by deepening the existing service platform rather than relying on non-core revenue streams, which supports a focused and scalable operating model.
- Revenue is fully concentrated in consulting (100% consulting_revenue_percent), leaving the firm exposed to a single service-line mix and limited diversification of earnings.
- The business appears partner-heavy, with 4 partners and only 20 staff, which can indicate key-person dependency and limited operating leverage if partner capacity changes.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0M (derived_revenue_per_partner), suggesting the valuation may be sensitive to partner productivity and retention rather than a broad base of producers.
- Billable hours of 30,000 against $8.0M gross revenue imply meaningful utilization dependence, so any decline in billable demand or realization could pressure earnings.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also means valuation is highly sensitive to maintaining current margin levels, with limited room for operating slippage.