- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting revenue at 100%, which indicates a fully consulting-based business model with no disclosed non-consulting mix.
- EBOC is 50%, showing that half of gross revenue is retained at the earnings level before partner distributions.
- The firm produces 30,000 billable hours, supporting a substantial recurring workload base.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure that supports the reported revenue base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating a high revenue concentration per equity holder based on the disclosed figures.
- EBOC of 50% indicates only moderate profitability, which can limit valuation multiple support versus higher-margin firms.
- All $8,000,000 of revenue comes from consulting, creating full service-line concentration and limited diversification for a buyer.
- With only 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm is relatively small, which can create scale and transition risk in a transaction.
- Revenue per partner of $2,000,000 suggests meaningful dependence on a very small partner group, increasing key-person risk for the buyer.
- Increase partner leverage and delegation, as 4 partners and 20 staff support $8.0M of revenue, suggesting room to expand non-partner execution and improve scalability.
- Grow billable hours or pricing within the existing consulting-only model, as 30,000 billable hours and 100% consulting revenue indicate a straightforward path to revenue expansion without changing service mix.
- Protect and potentially enhance the 50% EBOC margin through tighter utilization and delivery discipline, since current profitability is already strong and directly supports valuation.
- Build partner succession depth over time, as the partner group is relatively young at age 32 and concentrated in only 4 partners, which can support continuity and reduce key-person risk.
- Increase revenue per partner beyond the current $2.0M level by broadening staff-supported delivery and reducing reliance on partner production, improving both scale and valuation quality.
- Revenue is entirely consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), which leaves the firm exposed to a single service-line mix and limits diversification of earnings.
- The firm’s scale is modest relative to its revenue base, with 4 partners and 20 staff supporting $8.0M of gross revenue, which can create key-person and capacity risk if any partner or senior staff member is disrupted.
- Revenue per partner is high at $2.0M, suggesting meaningful dependence on a small partner group and potential pressure on continuity, succession, and retention.
- Billable hours of 30,000 across 20 staff imply a relatively concentrated workload, which may constrain flexibility and increase execution risk if utilization or staffing efficiency softens.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also means valuation is sensitive to maintaining current operating performance, leaving less room for margin compression without affecting earnings materially.