- Consulting accounts for 100% of gross revenue, indicating a fully advisory-focused practice rather than a mixed-service firm.
- The firm generated $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating the platform.
- EBOC is 50%, showing that half of revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and other items.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, giving it an established operating base with a 5:1 staff-to-partner ratio.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a strong productivity indicator on the provided figures.
- The practice reports 32 specialized niches, suggesting a broad set of defined service areas within the available data.
- EBOC is only 50%, which limits earnings conversion and compresses valuation relative to firms with higher owner cash flow margins.
- All $8.0 million of revenue is consulting revenue, creating full service-line concentration with no recurring or diversified compliance base to cushion buyer risk.
- The firm is spread across 32 specialized niches, which can dilute focus and make the platform harder to scale efficiently despite $8.0 million of revenue.
- With only 4 partners generating $8.0 million of revenue, the practice is highly partner-dependent at $2.0 million of revenue per partner, increasing succession and transition risk for a buyer.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 4 partners, a relatively lean 5.0 staff-to-partner ratio that may constrain capacity and scalability at the current revenue level.
- Maintain and expand the 50% EBOC margin, as the current profitability level is already strong and supports valuation upside if sustained at scale.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current $2.0 million by leveraging the 30,000 billable hours across a 4-partner platform and 20 staff members.
- Deepen the 32 specialized niches to strengthen differentiation and support higher-value consulting work, given that consulting already represents 100% of revenue.
- Improve leverage by expanding staff capacity relative to partners, which could allow more billable hours to be converted into revenue without proportionate partner time.
- Preserve and extend the current consulting-only revenue mix, since the firm’s 100% consulting revenue profile aligns with a focused, specialized operating model.
- Revenue is concentrated entirely in consulting work, with consulting_revenue_percent at 100%, which leaves the firm exposed to any slowdown or margin pressure in that single service line.
- The firm’s staffing base is relatively lean at 20 staff against 4 partners and $8.0 million of gross revenue, which may constrain delivery capacity and increase key-person dependency on the partner group.
- Revenue per partner is high at $2.0 million, suggesting the business may rely heavily on each partner’s production and retention, which can elevate transition risk in a transaction.
- The practice lists 32 specialized niches, indicating a broad but potentially fragmented service mix that may dilute operational focus and make scaling more complex.
- Billable hours of 30,000 across the firm imply meaningful utilization dependence, so any drop in billable demand or efficiency would directly affect earnings quality.