- Tax work is the core revenue stream, representing 63% of gross revenue and giving the firm a clear earnings concentration in its largest service line.
- The firm generated $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale for a two-partner practice.
- Revenue per partner is $4.0 million, indicating a high level of revenue concentration at the partner level.
- Audit contributes 33% of revenue, providing a substantial second service line alongside the dominant tax practice.
- The firm reported 30,000 billable hours, showing a sizable volume of fee-earning work supporting the revenue base.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates a materially compressed operating margin and limits valuation support relative to higher-earning firms.
- The firm has only 2 partners and 2 staff, creating a very small operating base that increases key-person and succession risk while also limiting scale.
- Revenue is heavily concentrated in tax at 63% versus 33% audit and only 4% consulting, which reduces service-line diversification and may pressure multiple quality.
- Revenue per partner is $4,000,000 across just 2 partners, suggesting the practice is highly dependent on a small leadership group and may face continuity risk for a buyer.
- Increase consulting and other non-compliance services from the current low 4% revenue mix to improve revenue diversity and reduce dependence on tax work, which represents 63% of revenue.
- Build leverage by adding staff below the current two-partner, two-staff structure, as the firm’s $8.0 million revenue and 30,000 billable hours suggest meaningful capacity to support a larger team.
- Protect and potentially expand the strong 50% EBOC margin by tightening delivery efficiency and pricing discipline, since profitability is already a clear valuation strength.
- Develop succession and continuity planning around the relatively young partner group, with partner ages at 32, to support long-term transferability and reduce key-person risk.
- Increase audit contribution from the current 33% of revenue if the firm can do so without eroding margins, as a more balanced service mix may improve resilience and valuation quality.
- Heavy dependence on tax work, which represents 63% of gross revenue, may limit diversification and make earnings more sensitive to changes in that service line.
- The firm’s revenue mix is concentrated in audit as well, at 33% of gross revenue, leaving only 4% from consulting and indicating a narrow service portfolio.
- With only 2 partners and 2 staff supporting 8 million of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the practice appears operationally lean and may face capacity and continuity risk if any key person is unavailable.
- Revenue per partner of 4 million suggests a high level of individual leverage, which can increase key-person dependency and make performance harder to sustain if partner productivity declines.
- An EBOC margin of 50% is solid but not exceptionally high, so there may be limited room to absorb staffing or pricing pressure without affecting profitability.