- Consulting is the largest revenue stream at 67% of gross revenue, indicating a business mix centered on advisory work.
- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which provides meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across four partners, showing a relatively productive partner base.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates that half of revenue remains after operating costs before partner compensation and other items.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, evidencing a substantial volume of chargeable work supporting current revenue levels.
- EBOC at 50% indicates only moderate profitability, which can limit valuation support versus more profitable peers.
- Consulting makes up 67% of revenue, creating service-mix concentration that increases exposure to a single line of business.
- Audit is only 11% of revenue, so the firm has limited recurring attest work to balance the more consulting-heavy mix.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million across four partners suggests meaningful partner dependence, which can pressure transferability at exit.
- The firm has 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, which may point to a relatively lean operating base and limited scale flexibility.
- Increase audit and tax mix from the current consulting-heavy profile to improve recurring, lower-cyclicality revenue and broaden the firm’s valuation base.
- Leverage the firm’s 50% EBOC margin to scale profitably by adding capacity or improving utilization, since the current economics indicate room to convert revenue growth into earnings growth.
- Build on the stated specialized niche focus to deepen differentiation and support higher-value advisory work, which can help sustain the 67% consulting revenue mix and pricing power.
- Improve partner leverage by expanding the 20-person staff base relative to four partners, allowing the firm to absorb more billable hours and grow revenue beyond the current 30,000-hour level.
- Increase revenue per partner from the current 2.0 million level by standardizing delivery and expanding the existing service mix, which would enhance scale and valuation efficiency.
- The firm is heavily weighted toward consulting, which represents 67% of revenue, so valuation may be more exposed to performance in a single service line than a more balanced practice.
- The practice mix is relatively concentrated in tax and audit work as well, with tax at 22% and audit at 11% of revenue, leaving limited diversification across service offerings.
- With 4 partners generating 8.0 million of gross revenue, revenue per partner is 2.0 million, indicating meaningful dependence on a small partner group for production and client delivery.
- The staffing base of 20 employees against 30,000 billable hours suggests a lean operating model, which may create capacity and continuity risk if utilization or retention weakens.
- The partner age field shows 32, which may indicate a younger ownership group and could imply succession or leadership depth risk if the firm has limited bench strength.