- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing a meaningful revenue base for valuation analysis.
- With 30,000 billable hours, the practice shows substantial annual production capacity.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating a 50% earnings before owner compensation margin on reported financials.
- The firm has 4 partners and 20 staff, giving it a 24-person operating base.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, which is a material productivity metric from a buyer’s perspective.
- All four partners are listed at age 20, which is the only explicit partner-age data provided and may indicate a very uniform partner profile.
- EBOC of 50% leaves only half of revenue available after partner compensation, which can limit seller economics and buyer upside.
- The firm has only 4 partners generating $8,000,000 of revenue, or $2,000,000 per partner, which indicates meaningful partner-level concentration of production.
- With 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, the firm has a relatively lean staffing base that may constrain capacity to scale without additional hires.
- All four partners are listed at age 20, which creates immediate succession and retention uncertainty because ownership and production are concentrated in a very young partner group.
- Increase partner leverage by expanding staff-supported delivery, as the firm has 4 partners, 20 staff, and 30,000 billable hours, suggesting room to scale revenue without adding partner count proportionally.
- Improve valuation through succession planning and continuity, since all four partners are shown at age 20, indicating an unusually concentrated ownership profile with limited visible transition depth in the data.
- Lift revenue per partner, currently $2.0 million, by increasing throughput and/or pricing on the existing $8.0 million revenue base.
- Preserve and potentially enhance profitability by maintaining the reported 50% EBOC margin while pursuing growth, as the current margin indicates a strong earnings base that can support expansion.
- The firm’s 50% EBOC margin is solid, but the absence of any disclosed net income, cash flow, or debt metrics limits visibility into true earnings quality and leverage risk for valuation purposes.
- With 4 partners and only 20 staff, the operating model appears partner-heavy, which can create key-person dependency and constrain scalability if partner availability changes.
- The partner ages are all shown as 20, 20, 20, 20, but the data provides no tenure or succession detail, leaving uncertainty around continuity and ownership transition risk.
- At $8.0 million of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the firm’s revenue base is modest relative to partner count, which may limit upside unless productivity or staffing efficiency improves.
- Revenue per partner of $2.0 million is respectable, but it also indicates meaningful reliance on partner-level production, which can pressure retention and transitionability in a sale process.