- Consulting is the largest revenue stream at 45% of gross revenue, indicating a meaningful advisory component in the mix.
- The firm generates $3,000,000 of gross revenue, providing a clear top-line scale for valuation analysis.
- EBOC is 77%, which indicates a high proportion of revenue remains after operating costs before owner compensation and taxes.
- Revenue per partner is $1,000,000 across 3 partners, showing a substantial per-partner economic output.
- The practice includes specialized niches, which is explicitly identified in the data and may support service differentiation within the stated niche focus.
- EBITDA before owner compensation is only 77% of revenue, which indicates a comparatively low profitability profile for a $3.0 million firm.
- The practice is heavily dependent on a very small team of 3 partners and 3 staff, creating key-person and capacity concentration risk for a buyer.
- Revenue per partner is $1.0 million, but with only 3 partners the firm has limited management depth and succession coverage.
- The service mix is concentrated in consulting at 45% of revenue, with audit at 22% and tax at 33%, which may limit diversification of earnings streams.
- Total billable hours of 12,345 on $3.0 million of revenue suggests modest scale, which can constrain leverage and make transition risk more material for a buyer.
- Increase the consulting mix, which already represents 45% of revenue, to support higher-value growth and improve valuation leverage if margins hold.
- Expand the tax practice, currently 33% of revenue, to deepen recurring service revenue and reduce reliance on the smaller audit segment at 22%.
- Build on the stated specialized niches to strengthen differentiation and pricing power, since niche focus can support more efficient growth and higher-quality earnings.
- Improve operating scale and leverage with only 3 partners and 3 staff, as the current small team suggests room to add capacity and spread fixed costs across a larger revenue base.
- Preserve and enhance the current EBOC margin of 77% by maintaining a favorable service mix and disciplined delivery as the firm grows.
- With only 3 staff supporting 3 partners, the firm appears operationally thin, which can create key-person dependency and limit scalability as workload grows.
- Revenue is concentrated in consulting (45%) and tax (33%), so the business may be more exposed to swings in those service lines than a more balanced practice mix.
- Revenue per partner of $1.0 million is solid, but with just $3.0 million of gross revenue overall, the platform may be too small to absorb overhead or transition costs efficiently.
- The partner-age field shows 33, which suggests a relatively young partner group and may indicate limited depth of succession or long-tenure leadership experience.
- The firm’s specialized niches are listed as 'testprod niches,' which implies a narrow or potentially unproven specialization base that could constrain valuation if not clearly differentiated.