- Consulting is the dominant revenue stream at 67% of gross revenue, giving the firm a clear service mix centered on advisory work.
- The firm generated $33.3 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale indicator for valuation analysis.
- EBOC is 77%, indicating a high proportion of earnings before owner compensation relative to revenue.
- Revenue per partner is $11.1 million across 3 partners, suggesting strong partner-level productivity.
- The firm produced 33,333 billable hours, providing a concrete base of fee-earning activity.
- Tax work contributes 22% of revenue, adding a diversified second service line alongside consulting.
- Consulting makes up 67% of revenue, creating a highly concentrated service mix that can re-rate valuation if that segment is less durable or more cyclical than recurring compliance work.
- Audit is only 11% of revenue, leaving the firm with a relatively small attest base and limited balance from higher-frequency assurance work.
- The firm has just 3 partners, which creates key-person and succession risk in a small ownership group and can constrain buyer confidence in post-close continuity.
- With 33 staff supporting $33,333,333 of revenue, scale is modest relative to output and may limit management depth and operating leverage.
- Revenue per partner is $11,111,111, indicating a very concentrated production base that can elevate dependency risk on each owner.
- Increase audit and tax mix from the current 11% audit and 22% tax revenue to reduce dependence on consulting, which represents 67% of revenue and drives concentration risk.
- Expand partner capacity or succession depth, as 3 partners support $33.3 million of gross revenue and $11.1 million of revenue per partner, indicating meaningful leverage opportunity.
- Improve utilization and throughput across the 33,333 billable hours and 33 staff to support higher revenue without proportional headcount growth.
- Preserve and potentially enhance the 77% EBOC margin by maintaining the current high-margin operating profile while scaling revenue.
- Build out recurring compliance and advisory work in tax and audit to create a more balanced service mix and support valuation stability relative to the current consulting-heavy profile.
- The firm is heavily weighted toward consulting, with 67% of revenue from consulting versus 11% from audit and 22% from tax, which may create earnings sensitivity if consulting demand or pricing softens.
- The business relies on a relatively small leadership base of 3 partners, so the loss or reduced capacity of any one partner could have an outsized impact on revenue generation and client delivery.
- With 33 staff supporting $33.3 million of gross revenue and 33,333 billable hours, the operating model appears dependent on efficient utilization, leaving limited room for productivity slippage.
- Revenue per partner of $11.1 million is high, which can indicate concentration of production and relationship management at the partner level and may be difficult to sustain through transition or growth.
- EBOC at 77% suggests strong current profitability, but it also implies limited visible cushion if margins compress from staffing, pricing, or utilization pressure.