- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- Consulting accounts for 100% of revenue, indicating a fully focused service mix with no practice-area diversification complexity.
- EBOC is 50% of revenue, which suggests a strong earnings conversion profile at the firm level.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across 4 partners, indicating high partner productivity.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, showing substantial annual delivery capacity supported by 20 staff.
- EBOC is 50%, which indicates only half of gross revenue remains after direct compensation and may pressure valuation multiples.
- All $8,000,000 of revenue is consulting revenue, creating full service-line concentration and limiting diversification for a buyer.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 across only 4 partners, which indicates meaningful partner-level dependence and potential succession exposure.
- With 20 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue and 30,000 billable hours, the firm appears relatively small in scale, which can limit operating leverage and buyer absorption efficiency.
- Increase revenue per partner by leveraging the current $8.0 million revenue base across only 4 partners, which indicates meaningful capacity to scale without immediate partner count growth.
- Expand utilization and throughput from the 30,000 billable hours already produced, as higher billable-hour volume can convert existing staffing into additional revenue with limited fixed-cost growth.
- Preserve and potentially improve the 50% EBOC margin by maintaining disciplined cost control while growing consulting revenue, supporting stronger valuation quality.
- Build on the firm’s 100% consulting revenue mix by deepening specialization within the existing service model, which can support pricing power and a clearer value proposition.
- Use the 20-person staff base to increase leverage under the partner group, improving partner productivity and supporting higher enterprise value if execution remains consistent.
- All revenue is consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), so the firm lacks service-line diversification and is fully exposed to any slowdown in advisory demand.
- The partner group is very small relative to the business (4 partners supporting $8.0M of gross revenue and 30,000 billable hours), creating key-person dependency and succession risk if one partner reduces involvement.
- Revenue per partner is high at $2.0M, which can indicate concentration of client relationships and delivery responsibilities at the partner level, increasing execution and continuity risk.
- The staffing base is modest (20 staff versus 4 partners), which may limit scalability and increase operational strain as billable volume grows.
- The partner-age field is limited to a single value ('23'), which provides insufficient visibility into succession timing and makes transition risk harder to underwrite.