- 100% of gross revenue is consulting revenue, indicating a fully fee-based service mix with no dependence on non-consulting lines.
- The firm generated $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale for a buyer evaluating acquisition size and integration potential.
- EBOC is 50%, showing that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses before partner compensation and taxes, which is a strong valuation metric.
- The firm produced 30,000 billable hours, providing clear evidence of substantial delivery volume and utilization capacity.
- With 4 partners and 20 staff, the firm has a defined operating structure and a 5:1 staff-to-partner ratio that supports service delivery.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million, indicating high revenue concentration per equity holder from the provided figures.
- EBOC of 50% suggests only moderate profitability, which can cap valuation versus higher-margin advisory firms.
- All revenue is consulting revenue (100%), indicating complete service-line concentration and no recurring diversification from other offerings.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 across just 4 partners, creating meaningful key-person dependence and succession risk given the limited leadership base.
- The firm has only 20 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, which may limit operational scale and reduce buyer confidence in capacity to absorb growth without added investment.
- Expand partner capacity and succession depth, as 4 partners support $8.0M of gross revenue and a $2.0M revenue-per-partner base, indicating room to scale beyond the current ownership structure.
- Increase leverage by adding staff or improving delegation, as 20 staff support 30,000 billable hours and the firm’s current staffing profile may limit further revenue growth without additional capacity.
- Preserve and potentially enhance the 50% EBOC margin through disciplined pricing and utilization management, since the current profitability level is already strong and directly supports valuation.
- Build a broader client-service platform beyond the current all-consulting revenue mix, as 100% of revenue comes from consulting and diversification could reduce concentration in a single service line.
- Develop succession and continuity planning around the relatively young partner group, as partner ages of 32 suggest long runway but also a need to formalize future leadership and ownership transition to protect value.
- All revenue is consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), so the firm lacks service-line diversification and is fully exposed to any slowdown in consulting demand or pricing pressure.
- The partner group is very small relative to the firm’s scale (4 partners, 20 staff, gross_revenue: $8.0M), which increases key-person dependency and succession risk if one or more partners reduce involvement.
- Revenue per partner is high at $2.0M, indicating meaningful concentration of production at the partner level and potential execution risk if partner capacity or retention changes.
- Billable volume of 30,000 hours against $8.0M of revenue suggests the business is highly labor-dependent, which can constrain scalability and make growth reliant on continued utilization.
- The reported EBOC margin of 50% is strong, but it also implies valuation is sensitive to maintaining current operating performance, leaving less room for margin compression without affecting earnings materially.