- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, providing meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- All revenue is consulting-based at 100%, which gives the practice a clear service mix with no stated dependence on other lines of business.
- EBOC is 50%, indicating a substantial earnings margin relative to revenue.
- Revenue per partner is $2.0 million across 4 partners, which supports strong partner productivity.
- The firm reports 30,000 billable hours, showing a sizable volume of chargeable work supporting the revenue base.
- EBOC of 50% suggests only moderate earnings conversion, which can limit valuation if a buyer is underwriting cash flow rather than top-line revenue.
- The firm is 100% consulting revenue, creating full reliance on a single service line and reducing diversification from a buyer's perspective.
- Revenue per partner is $2,000,000 across only 4 partners, indicating meaningful partner dependence and potential key-person exposure in a small ownership group.
- With 20 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, the firm is relatively small in scale, which can constrain absorption of overhead and reduce platform depth for a strategic buyer.
- Partner ages of 50 indicate an aging ownership base, which can raise succession timing considerations in a transaction.
- Increase revenue per partner by expanding the current $2.0M per-partner base, which is supported by $8.0M of gross revenue across 4 partners and indicates room to improve scale leverage.
- Preserve and potentially improve the 50% EBOC margin by maintaining the firm’s consulting-only mix and tightening delivery efficiency across 30,000 billable hours.
- Build succession and continuity value by formalizing transition planning for the 4 partners, whose ages are all around 50, to reduce key-person concentration risk over time.
- Increase staff leverage by growing the 20-person team relative to the partner group, which could support higher billable capacity and better partner productivity without changing the current consulting focus.
- All revenue is consulting-based (consulting_revenue_percent: 100), so the firm lacks service-line diversification and is fully exposed to any slowdown in that single revenue stream.
- The firm’s scale is modest relative to its partner group (gross_revenue: 8000000; partners: 4; revenue_per_partner: 2000000), which can constrain operating leverage and make the business more dependent on each partner’s individual production.
- Staffing depth appears limited versus workload (billable_hours: 30000; staff: 20), which may create execution and capacity risk if demand increases or key personnel are unavailable.
- Partner succession risk is present because the only age data provided shows partners at 50 (partner_ages: 50), indicating a mid-career ownership group with no visible younger bench or transition detail in the data.