- The firm generates $8.0 million of gross revenue, which is a meaningful scale for a buyer to underwrite.
- With 30,000 billable hours, the practice shows substantial annual production capacity supported by measurable utilization.
- The firm reports 50% EBOC, indicating a clearly stated profitability metric that can be evaluated in diligence.
- Revenue per partner is $4.0 million, reflecting a high level of revenue concentration per equity owner.
- The firm has 30 staff supporting 2 partners, suggesting meaningful leverage in the operating model.
- EBOC is only 50%, which indicates a mid-level earnings margin and leaves limited buffer for a buyer to underwrite a premium valuation.
- The firm has only 2 partners, creating a pronounced key-person dependency and making the platform vulnerable to disruption if either partner exits.
- Both partners are age 59, which creates near-term succession and transition risk that may pressure client retention and continuity.
- Revenue per partner is $4,000,000, so a large share of firm revenue is concentrated at the partner level and may be harder to scale without added leadership depth.
- With just 30 staff supporting $8,000,000 of revenue, the firm appears relatively small in operating scale, which can limit buyer confidence in post-close absorption and growth capacity.
- Increase revenue per partner by improving leverage across the 30-person staff base, as the firm currently generates $4.0M per partner with only 2 partners supporting $8.0M of revenue.
- Expand billable capacity and utilization from the existing 30,000 billable hours to support higher revenue without adding proportional partner headcount, given the current $8.0M revenue base.
- Preserve and transfer client relationships proactively because both partners are age 59, reducing key-person risk and supporting valuation continuity.
- Improve operating efficiency and margin conversion from the current 50% EBOC margin, which indicates meaningful room to enhance earnings quality and valuation.
- Scale the firm’s earnings base through broader delegation to staff, since the current 2-partner structure suggests additional leverage could unlock growth without immediate partner expansion.
- Both partners are age 59, creating near-term succession and continuity risk because ownership and leadership are concentrated in just two individuals.
- The firm’s revenue is concentrated at the partner level, with $4.0 million of revenue per partner on $8.0 million total revenue and only 2 partners, which increases key-person dependency.
- At 30 staff against 2 partners and $8.0 million of revenue, the firm may face supervision and scalability pressure if partner capacity becomes constrained.
- EBOC margin is 50%, which is solid but leaves less cushion than a higher-margin practice if partner transition costs or staffing inefficiencies emerge.
- The absence of any practice breakdown or other operating detail in the data limits visibility into the stability and mix of the revenue base, increasing diligence uncertainty.