- The firm generates $5.0 million of gross revenue with only one partner, indicating a highly concentrated revenue base that is directly tied to a single owner’s economics.
- Billable hours of 30,000 support a meaningful operating scale for a 20-person staff, showing the practice is already producing substantial chargeable work.
- EBOC of 50% indicates that half of gross revenue remains after operating expenses, which is a material profitability metric for valuation analysis.
- The firm’s revenue per partner is $5.0 million, reflecting very high revenue concentration per equity owner given there is only one partner.
- The staff count of 20 suggests the firm has a sizable non-partner delivery base relative to its single-partner structure.
- The firm is partner-dependent, with 100% of the $5,000,000 revenue generated by a single partner, creating key-person and transition risk for a buyer.
- EBOC is only 50%, which signals a relatively thin earnings profile on $5,000,000 of gross revenue and limits valuation support.
- With just 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours, the firm may have limited operating scale relative to its workload, which can constrain post-close capacity and growth flexibility.
- The sole partner is 32 years old, so there is no evidence of near-term succession pressure that would support a buyer discount for retirement transition, but the structure still leaves the firm highly concentrated in one individual.
- Increase partner leverage by building out the 20-person staff base around the single partner, which could improve scalability and reduce key-person concentration risk.
- Improve profitability from the current 50% EBOC margin by tightening pricing, staffing mix, or workflow efficiency to capture more value from the existing $5.0M revenue base.
- Expand billable capacity beyond the current 30,000 billable hours by increasing utilization or adding capacity, creating room for revenue growth without relying solely on the current partner.
- Reduce succession and continuity risk associated with having one partner by developing additional leadership depth, which can support valuation through lower key-person dependency.
- Use the current $250,000 revenue per staff member and $5.0M revenue per partner profile to justify disciplined scaling of the existing platform before adding complexity.
- Single-partner structure (1 partner) creates key-person dependency and succession risk, with all $5.0M of revenue tied to one owner.
- Staffing leverage appears thin for the scale of the practice, with only 20 staff supporting 30,000 billable hours and $5.0M of revenue, which may constrain capacity and continuity.
- The firm’s 50% EBOC margin is solid but still leaves meaningful earnings sensitivity if compensation, utilization, or overhead drift unfavorably.
- Revenue per partner is $5.0M because there is only one partner, which increases valuation concentration in that individual’s productivity and limits immediate management depth.
- The partner age field shows 32, which suggests the current ownership profile may be relatively early-stage and may require additional time to build a broader succession bench.