war166
Strategic Advisory Excellence Since 1984
Executive Dashboard
Strategic Outlook 2026–2028
$11.1M
Annual Gross Revenue
47.75%
EBITDA Margin
$39.8M - $47.8M
Valuation Range
95.50%
Economic Profit%
1
No. of Equity Partners
$1,000/hr
Avg Client Rate ($/hr)
1
Total Employees
50%
Overhead as % of Revenue
Valuation-Based Strategic Position
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Strengths
  • Consulting drives 78% of revenue, indicating a business mix that is heavily weighted toward advisory work.
  • Gross revenue is 11.1 million, which provides a meaningful top-line base for valuation analysis.
  • Revenue per partner is 11.1 million, reflecting that the firm’s revenue is concentrated under a single partner structure.
  • Billable hours total 11,111, showing a measurable level of productive fee-earning activity.
  • The firm reports specialized niches, which suggests at least some defined practice focus in its service offering.
Weaknesses
  • Consulting accounts for 78% of revenue, creating a heavy service-mix concentration that can increase valuation risk if that line is disrupted.
  • The firm has only one partner and one staff member, which creates extreme key-person and capacity risk and limits scalability.
  • The sole partner is 55, so the business has limited disclosed succession depth and is exposed to owner-dependency risk.
  • Audit and tax together represent only 22% of revenue, indicating a relatively narrow traditional compliance base compared with the consulting-heavy mix.
Opportunities
  • Increase audit and tax contribution from the current low 11 percent each by expanding those service lines to create a more balanced revenue mix and reduce reliance on consulting, which is 78 percent of revenue.
  • Build leverage beyond the current one-partner, one-staff structure to improve capacity, scalability, and revenue per partner while reducing key-person concentration risk.
  • Monetize the stated niche positioning by deepening the specialized niche offering to support pricing power and differentiation, which can help sustain the 50 percent EBOC margin.
  • Use the firm’s high revenue per partner base to justify selective growth in billable hours and additional capacity, preserving profitability while increasing total scale.
Threats
  • Revenue is heavily concentrated in consulting at 78%, with audit and tax each only 11%, which may limit diversification and make the earnings base more dependent on one service line.
  • The firm appears to be a very small owner-operated practice with one partner and one staff member, creating key-person dependency and limited management depth for a buyer.
  • Partner age is 55, so succession timing may be a consideration if the business relies materially on a single principal for client delivery and origination.
  • Billable hours of 11,111 against gross revenue of 11,111,111 imply an unusually high revenue yield per hour, which may be difficult to sustain without strong pricing power or leverage.
  • EBOC at 50% suggests only moderate operating margin after compensation and overhead, leaving less cushion if staffing, utilization, or pricing weakens.
Enhance Profitability

May drive premium valuation, strong cash flow, and high investor demand while supporting scalable growth and resilience.

47.75% EBITDA margin
Operational Efficiency

Improving leverage to 5:1 can increase profitability and firm value by 20-35%.

Leverage ratio 1:1
Revenue Acceleration

Without a defined growth rate, growth may be accelerated by adding advisory services, pursuing tuck-in mergers, or onboarding a lateral partner with an existing book of business.

+15–25% revenue growth
Risk Mitigation

Adding even one partner can eliminate the -1.0 to -1.5 multiple penalty, potentially increasing firm value by 25-40%.
May support continuity, smoother succession planning, stronger long-term client retention, and greater capacity to adapt to growth and innovation initiatives.

[-1.0, -1.5]

This preliminary valuation range is for discussion purposes only, based on unverified information, and is highly sensitive to assumptions. It does not constitute a formal valuation or transaction guidance and should not be relied upon by any party for decision-making purposes.